Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 26. sij

    How to make sense of the (seemingly inborn) skills of animals and newborns? thinks that they must be explained through competences acquired in a previous birth. But, wait, did not we have infinte lives before the current one? 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. 30. sij

    Early sources discuss perception in the following way: "That which is perception, does not err. If it errs, it is not perception". This appears to mean that perception and hallucination etc. are altogether different cognitive events 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. 17. ruj 2019.

    I usually presuppose that each author aims at communicating a meaning and not just at muddling it. In this way, I managed to even enjoy reading Maṇḍana and Prabhākara, although at times they are really terse. 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 29. sij

    Are there things which are absolutely non-existing? And if so, why can we think of them? 's mentions horned hares (but unicorns would also work) and says that they appear as real because they are made up of elements we have seen in other species.

  5. 17. ruj 2019.

    However, Udayana is shaking my convictions. After hours on the same passage, I am still unsure I am understanding it correctly and get at most a general idea of what his point is. What helped you reading Udayana? 2/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 26. sij

    General problem: What is the status of "entities" we need for thought, but for which we are not ready to say that they exist? Say, unicorns, alternative worlds, present kings of France? discusses the issue in connection with absence: 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  7. prije 15 sati

    with which one attended the experience (e.g.: bathing a new-born for the first time). Do you agree? 2/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. 1. velj

    as well as a historical appraisal of Meghanadāri's indebtedness to and . Who authored it? Again, the incredible .

    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. 29. sij

    as its center. Thus, the appearance of the sentence as conveying a single purpose is legitimate, because there is a single principal unity. I.e., you need a center in the middle in order for the rest to make sense. 2/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. 26. sij

    (one needs to grasp the absence of milk in curds and of curds in milk). Hence, absence needs to be known. But is it also something real, *since it is known*?In other words, does an epistemic necessity lead to an ontological necessity as well? 2/3

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 23. velj 2019.

    Immortality and death both reside in the body, Death comes from temptation and immortality comes from truth. @ Mysuru

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.