-
A nine-Judge Bench of the
#SupremeCourt takes up for hearing matter concerning questions of rights of women as against religious rights under Articles 25 and 26. These questions were referred to a larger Bench in the Review petition filed against#Sabarimala verdict. pic.twitter.com/1oc0rSUSW1
Prikaži ovu nit -
Religion, private properties should be kept away from governance/JUDICIARY purviews as they have made discriminatory laws like Hindus Succession Act which SUPREME COURT is upholding got millions daughters killed not got their parental inheritance but Sabarimala? Farce
#Sabarimala -
Far from deciding the 'larger issues' of essential religious practices, etc, the nine-judge Bench now faces the preliminary task of trying to explain its own existence
#SabarimalaPrikaži ovu nit -
Fali Nariman bells the cat on how a review of the
#Sabarimala case ended up with SC using its extraordinary powers u/Art 142 to form a larger Bench to 'interpret' & define essential religious practices across multiple faiths. CJI concedes Nariman has a 'formidable point there'Prikaži ovu nit -
CJI says Nariman may be "correct" in saying 'decide the law as and when cases come' not in anticipation or pre-emption of their coming
#SabarimalaPrikaži ovu nit -
Supreme Court's nine-judge bench, headed by CJI Sharad Arvind Bobde, begins hearing the
#Sabarimala temple matter and other related cases involving entry of women into the temple. Follow for updates: https://bit.ly/2tlZTHK pic.twitter.com/er4hRJCPJL
-
#Sabarimala matter to be heard on 6 January by the nine judge bench of the SC. Follow for updates: http://bit.ly/31mcEPm pic.twitter.com/gqEJurnSKl
-
A nine-judge Constitution bench of the SC resumed examining the matters related to the entry of women into
#Sabarimala temple and discrimination against women at other religious places. http://bit.ly/31lweuW -
#Sabarimala LEGENDARY FALI NARIMAN QUESTIONS CLUBBING OF OTHER ISSUES WITH SABARIMALA Nariman: SC cannot club other issues with it. SC cant frame new questions. Scope of review is very restricted. This will set a new precedent. How can you think about other issues in a review? -
A very informative thread! Rangarajan garu made such valid legal observations! Is anyone that matters listening??
#sabarimala https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1223666931837759488 … -
#Sabarimala The lawyer Narimen is a parsi. His ancestors had come as refugees to India. Now this once upon refugee is asking us hindus how can the court review a judgement on sabarimala. He has audacity to ask the majority people and interfere in our religion.Prikaži ovu nit -
A nine-judge Bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, is hearing several senior lawyers, including jurist F.S. Nariman, on the issue of framing of questions to be decided by it http://bit.ly/31hIhth
#Sabarimala -
#Sabarimala CJI suggests adjourning the matter for the time being for framing the issues, including the preliminary issue of possibility of reference in the review jurisdiction.Prikaži ovu nit -
Top Supreme Court lawyers oppose "erroneous" reference to wider issues in
#Sabarimala case review. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/top-supreme-court-lawyers-oppose-erroneous-reference-to-wider-issues-in-sabarimala-case-review-2174241 …pic.twitter.com/TnXK2G1Ra7
-
Already they have taxed properties with PROPERTY tax despite bought after paid IT, revenue fee at registration, development tax at construction time & now, property tax? Why should we pay any taxes post income is taxed & then, every expenditure too including HOUSING?
#Sabarimala -
#Sabarimala case: SC to frame questions relating to discrimination against#women in religions http://bit.ly/3b7OXhW -
#Sabarimala it's a matter of great faith and judiciary should consider this RT if you agree!! https://twitter.com/barandbench/status/1224197458302865408 …
-
#Sabarimala: Reference to larger bench is not permissible in review petition Review can only be used to correct errors in main judgment. It can't be used to frame issues and refer same to larger bench. That could have been done only during pendency of writ petition, Shyam DivanPrikaži ovu nit -
Narrow decisions on the right to privacy but let's re-think 70 years of imposing constitutional norms on religion. That's our CJI for you
#Sabarimala https://twitter.com/barandbench/status/1224211931038285825 …
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.