Search results
  1. 7 hours ago
    Replying to

    Actually Rex Murphy did obtain a BA in English, which enables him to collect up nonsense and rubbish and craft it into a witty presentation of trash. It's all good enough for the

  2. 12 hours ago
    Replying to
  3. 7 hours ago

    What Rex Murphy has wrong is that it is not what "greens and enviros say is necessary" it is the level of change that science and the laws of thermodynamics show is necessary: has no science education, his ignorance is so painfully obvious.

  4. 29 Dec 2018

    I can understand every sixth word of 's column in . Does he even make sense? Please, Rex- its time. Go.

  5. 31 Dec 2018

    Can we please name the next school in Alberta after Rex Murphy. A real champion of truth, public discourse and defender of our provinces economic well-being.

  6. 7 hours ago

    Boys! Folks are praying for Rex's obit. Too Much. Fucking relax. We all deserve a forum to present POV. Rex Might not always be right. But an alternative viewpoint is always worth considering!!! OR Dismissing.

  7. Jan 3
    Replying to and

    Oh, boy! The first of 2019 as the first day of the is winding down in Washington and this could be the focal point on every Sunday morning talk show on television 📺 this weekend and if finds out about this, he’s going to be very disappointed ☹️

  8. 9 hours ago
    Replying to

    Well said Rex!! This world needs a strong CANADA. A CANADA that sells GHG reducing LNG to the Far East. Why? It is so simple:

  9. 7 hours ago
    Replying to

    We saw age 16 making a difference to , now we have raving lunatic Rex Murphy trying to tell us that is far too small to make a difference in one of the most stupid columns has ever printed. Insanity on steroids.

  10. 29 Dec 2018

    Rex Murphy is perhaps so in love with the verbiage coming from the far right side of his language lobe that he hasn't realized even a dead, dismembered colleague wouldn't quote from "The Securities Study Group." Bad form Rex.

  11. 20 hours ago
    Replying to

    Brilliant writing by . You nailed it perfectly. Say no to

  12. 30 Dec 2018
    Replying to

    is a tragic drunk. It’s a commonly known deep secret. Explains his judgment on many things...

  13. 30 Dec 2018

    As you might just know that I’ve been caught up watching ’s Point of View commentaries after the panel on ’s page just before retired back in June of last year

  14. 29 Dec 2018

    The brilliant : Today’s journalists are not ‘guardians of the truth’ as claimed by TIME magazine. In a column for the , Rex Murphy sheds light on the real Jamal Khashoggi who he says was not a journalist, but rather a stooge if Qatar

  15. 29 Dec 2018

    is pretty much a Shill for Big Oil....

  16. 30 Dec 2018

    Waiting for Rex Murphy's belated op-ed piece where he demythologises Daniel Pearl by arguing that, as he was operating as an "advocate" of the editorially pro-war _Wall Street Journal_, his murder was unfortunate but he sorta had it coming.

  17. 30 Dec 2018

    Uh, do you not think the science is settled? You realize the majority of climate scientists also sing this note, right?

  18. 29 Dec 2018
    Replying to

    is: “a highly-partisan operative...to publish propaganda… in other words, an agent of influence.” has been paid to speak for Oil Sands companies, upwards of an estimated 25 times in the last five years, at a rate as high as $30,000 a pop

  19. 29 Dec 2018
    Replying to

    So, is having a tantrum Likely b/c HE isn't Time's choice Well, I'M PISSED Too! I had to give The National RAG the "klick" Just to read what Sir Snob-of-TO had to rant Don't recommend it Rexie's just not worth it and neither is The National Rag

  20. 30 Dec 2018
    Replying to

    Good question Charlie! I turn off tv, radio whatever if is bafflegabbing

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.