Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 56 sekundi
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    so I agree that 50% of our self-contradictions amount to our being equally dumb when predicting [the future in general] as "the scientific method" (aka in "GOOD predictions amount to accurate measurements of POWER")

  2. prije 10 minuta

    Sie sollen die Umsetzung Ihres in Ihrer Praxis nachweisen? Mit dem --Praxishandbuch haben Sie individualisierbare Praxis- und QM-Formulare, Infos & Musterablaufbeschreibungen auf einen Blick:

  3. prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    panther mo dynamics is m

  4. prije 12 sati

    we debated Zeno's absurdities in favor of additional observations then invented a new synonyms of "additional": "quantum"

  5. Now that the says it will scrap an unpopular standard for so-called qualified mortgages, the big question is what will take its place?

  6. prije 23 sata

    Someone really just said I pay 9k for the library

  7. 4. velj

    Need some first information about [FP]-LIMS? [FP]-LIMS - Analyses Management Software by Fink Partner via

  8. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I'm not understanding why but as soon I suggest this by quoting the namesake of people think I'm a complete bozo, which is only 50% accurate: "the particularly exigent demand is the square root" --from What Is Life? "good predictions amount to accurate measurements of power"

  9. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    so more specifically, but the same answer (baiting) How are we more interested in human celebrity power when willfully avoiding collisions rather than being created at a point in the past and destroyed at a point in the future? I think kinetic thoughts are kinetic energy

  10. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    any consistent usage of the spelling "nothing" can't "be" what it is being used to identify (between "additional" observations); the "identifier mathematics" or "being" square root differentiation, including the spelling "zero complete annihilation of the future in general"

  11. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This interview can be accounted for in terms of "making good predictions as accurate measurements of power". So the square root symbol can be used when labeling precise +differentiation- between generic solipsisms (like "never") and generic futurisms (like "always")

  12. 1. velj

    Giving up. That’s a sin

  13. 31. sij

    Una nueva forma de innovar y que además ayuda al planeta.

  14. Excited to learn about the efforts of other UNC System Schools to improve course quality!!!

  15. 31. sij

    Still standing

  16. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    so a signature first law observation (distance between exclusive points, sides AB) one square root one second law signature (2D): one square root two (ABCD) third law signature (3D): one square root of three (ABCD EFGH) Google matrix mechanics and any other for (+-) usage IRL

  17. 30. sij

    Estamos marcados en el mapa, te damos la mejor calidad siempre.

  18. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    predicting nothing hasn't annihilated everything we observe between exclusive predictions === excluding zero probability in favor of additional evidence

  19. 30. sij

    that Vimeo is On Real and Virtual Space, explaining how "works": exclusive predictions direct additional observations in terms of +(L)+(R)+ when excluding (-) zero and negative probabilities of being created and destroyed IRL

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 30. sij

    One of the best practices is to facilitate the upgrading of legacy processes for organizations. ~ Paul Mak'Abongo

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.