Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 1. velj

    If there's something positive for me in , I feel as a young scientist this experience has shown me just how important keeping REALLY excellent records of raw data/analyses and making my data publicly available are.

  2. The thing that I am the most upset about regarding is not the false data (that is unacceptable) but that many junior scientists from his lab were inadvertently pulled into these allegations and even to the lies. My heart is with them.

  3. 1. velj

    This article hurts . Data patterns don’t lie. People do. Don’t support a swap of victim and perpetrator roles.

  4. 2. velj

    After , , or , people wonder why someone would tamper with their own data. If I look at my own experience in prominent places (Ivy League and others), it seems pretty obvious.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  5. 2. velj

    Full account of the last major case of alleged scientific misconduct in behavioral ecology (the AP Møller case). Must-read for anyone interested in A Fluctuating Reality

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 30. sij

    A comment on blog: we ( and others) started our investigations after being alerted by a junior scientist with inside information. I am most grateful to this . This anonymous scientist deserves our thanks and gratitude

    Prikaži ovu nit
  7. 1. velj

    Another thing that has come out of & is need to tackle the issue of valuing "significant" findings. This requires culture change in the academy. How often have u heard a newbie student (or even seasoned pro) say "UNFORTUNATELY we didn't find signif results.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The formula of hyperproductivity in HI journals that favour publishing significant results/large effect sizes as a path to prestigious grants/chairs must be scrutinized. It’s not rocket science to see how the systemic structures in place played a role here.

  9. 2. velj

    So many BAD takes on on these internets, w many folks wrapping it into their pet issues academia. I think there is a GOOD take - and it is that of the honest hardworking co-authors & those affected & people digging into the data - we're lucky to hear from them. 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. 2. velj

    In light of the weak and unsatisfactory response by in the recent Science-piece to allegations of fraud, I think it is necessary to take a strong stand against unacceptable and unethical behaviours in science

  11. 1. velj

    I wonder how many people fabricate data without ever getting caught

  12. 2. velj

    This piece is response to . My heart goes out to the collaborators, students, editors, and everyone who's been personally affected by this shocking and heartbreaking situation.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  13. prije 18 sati

    Reading the comments on re: . Truly fascinating. People debating over whether 1 spider can be touching 9 other spiders in 3d webs. Lots of modeling & graphs & ppl making spiders out of pipe cleaners to elucidate points. Riveting.

  14. 1. velj
  15. 2. velj

    1/3 As an outsider to this situation, hearing that everything that has come out are "all mistakes (...) not unheard of in data management" is a bit odd and really comes across as gaslighting

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 2. velj

    One thought I haven’t seen discussed re: - many of the reviews are listed as ok b/c they don’t contain data - but if those reviews rely heavily on Pruitt’s papers to suggest broad patterns, they could have similarly problematic impact, no?

  17. prije 21 sat

    Today I was introduced by a colleague as a spider behavioral ecologist and the room went awfully quiet. Lets make sure to not throw any babies out with the bathwater as we move forward.

  18. 2. velj

    Some useful points raised here in relation to and : be prepared to invest time in learning the study organism and its natural history, and be not satisfied with only being sent a dataset from a collaborator:

  19. 30. sij

    RESPECT to on her handling of this. Openly retracted the papers, admitted fault and apologised. Her integrity is rightly recognised, not the original oversights with . Her response may even strengthen her reputation more than those papers being on her CV

  20. 31. sij

    Victims may also be found in those who were not involved with these publications but failed to get funding or jobs when they were ranked against other scientists with a superficially more impressive looking publication record.

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.