Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 6 minuta

    Highly recommend reading: Papers with female corresponding authors, and also for ethnically and geographically diverse populations fare somewhat less well through editorial assessment and peer review

  2. prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Great example of an a-scientific, anedoctical, polemical account on based on stories of unlucky cases statistically irrelevant?

  3. prije 2 sata

    I'd once again like to highlight the academy to those new to . Even after the initial training I find myself going back in for reminders and helpful tips, not only for reviewing but also for my own writing.

  4. Regular revision is associated with better writing performance, and meaningful revision is often driven by feedback. Teacher Development Series #1 explains how to teach meaningful peer feedback.

  5. prije 4 sata

    "Preliminary data that might once have run the gantlet of before being published can now be downloaded by anyone, sparking misinterpretations and conspiracy theories."

  6. prije 4 sata

    Received an incorrect review from a conference (a review for a different paper). What should I do?

  7. prije 4 sata

    Learn how to navigate the dos and don’ts of Peer Review and .

  8. "We want to be as author-friendly as possible, looking for reasons to accept rather than reject. Some papers are of course rejected (not yet ready, hypothesis or interpretation is unclear, etc). The process frequently improves papers dramatically, but sometimes..."

  9. prije 5 sati

    There will be at least once in every researcher's life when you know that the peer-reviewer is dead wrong, but you're simply too exhausted to fight anymore, so you submit an inferior paper. And then sigh.

  10. prije 6 sati

    I got back reviewer's comments for a paper... Everything normal, except... 8 reviewers for one manuscript!?! A little bit overdoing it maybe? It's not like we are proposing a new interpretation of quantum mechanics... 😆

  11. prije 13 sati

    This is me since February 2019

  12. prije 14 sati

    The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude means of discovering the acceptability— not the validity — of a new finding.

  13. 2. velj

    Dear Journal Leadership: if you're not open access, what about rewarding reviewers with free access to the journal for, say, 3 months? Access granted upon completion of review-& more free access (perhaps 6mos) if the review is on time/early?

  14. 1. velj

    Just finished my annual review: 15 journal article reviews 7 full book manuscripts for presses, 7 tenure and/or promotion cases in 2019. I am tired. Also, my balance sheet of reviewer labor used and provided is in the clear

  15. 31. sij

    We are pleased to now offer automated reviewer recognition via . Submit your review for and opt to have your review recorded on your Publons profile. 📸: Patrick Fore

  16. 31. sij

    All of the submitted abstracts for will receive notice of acceptance or rejection no later than 24 February.

  17. 31. sij

    Want to know more about the process but don't know who to ask? Got questions about publication ethics and research integrity? Watch the 2nd episode in 's webinar series How to Publish now.

  18. 30. sij

    Doing some before the 24/7 speeches tomorrow.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.