-
I could clap a bit. Keeping Senate means keeping
#SCOTUS balanced and perhaps even moving originalism.#NoHearingsNoVotes succeeded. -
And lest I forget, major props --again-- to
@SenateMajLdr for calling for#NoHearingsNoVotes and sticking with it. Every@GOP senator who -
.
@LindseyGrahamSC is --smartly-- going to remind Ds (and MSM) about#TheBidenRule. Necessary to correct the record about#NoHearingsNoVotes -
Judge Garland is a fine man, as Judge Kavanaugh has testified.
@senatemajldr, using majority, declared#NoHearingsNoVotes, pursuant to the “Biden Rule” and the people voted. The smearing and politics of personal destruction never directed at him, or Justices Kagan/Sotomayor. And https://twitter.com/Jimmyspolitics/status/1044993429879607296 …Show this thread -
Annnnd, same question: we have
@potus under multiple investigations for election tampering, conspiracy & poss. obstruction with a major midterm election less than 6 mos away. Why should the people not be heard from...Hugh?#NoHearingsNoVotes, right? https://twitter.com/Gittelrock/status/992057720709640192 …
-
Something like
#NoHearingsNoVotes? How does your staff put out these tweets with a clear conscience? -
I thought
#nohearingsnovotes was a bad idea and argued the whole time that Garland should've been confirmed, but I think it's nonsense to -
.
@SenDanCoats Thank you for fighting to stop Obama's Supreme Court scheme!#NoHearingsNoVotes -
No, before Judge Garland was nominated by
@BarackObama I declared#NoHearingsNoVotes per “Biden Rule.” Sauce for the goose and need to let people decide. It is “majority rules” on nominations in the Senate since Harry Reid changed rules. But Dr. Ford should appear Tue or Wed https://twitter.com/ron_fournier/status/1041656362122526721 … -
#NoHearingsNoVotes ring a bell? -
I actually think
@SenateMajLdr deserves a few props, here. Thanks for holding firm on#NoHearingsNoVotes. cc:@hughhewitt#Election2016 -
"McConnell Rule" is
#nohearingsnovotes in year 8 not 4 b/c POTUS not on ballot, & when opp party holds Senate -
Perhaps you miss my point.
#NoHearingsNoVotes was perfectly constitutional. "Blue slips" are, at best, extra-Constitutional + likely contra https://twitter.com/jbendery/status/908094361682038784 … -
#NoHearingsNoVotes worked but that doesn't make it any less of an embarrassment. And people haven't forgotten. -
Long overdue kudos to
@SenateMajLdr and#NoHearingsNoVotes. Contra conventional wisdom, voters care deeply re courts https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/as-the-gorsuch-nomination-proceeds-this-man-is-taking-credit-mitch-mcconnell/2017/02/18/a9d66a46-f5eb-11e6-b9c9-e83fce42fb61_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_pwr-mcconnell-1050am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.3c16ed0be16f … -
exactly. holding no hearings forecloses the circus. and prevents an honorable man from being run throug the mud. in front of his wife and kids.
#NoHearingsNoVotes was the fair and kind thing to do per a nominee who was not going to be confirmed.
https://twitter.com/AG_Conservative/status/1037781571120652288 … -
Are we less divided then we were then? Is the climate more-or-less polarized? Every justification you gave for blocking Merrick Garland has increased. So will you call for
#NoHearingsNoVotes again? -
unprecedented and disfiguring power grabs by Reid/Leavy whereas
#NoHearingsNoVotes consistent w/#TheBidenRule and past practice? -
@SenateMajLdr you took a chance with your political career with#NoHearingsNoVotes and it paid off! Congrats on a bold successful move. -
"indulged the belief that Dems would abide by rules of decency, civility" Oh, that is rich Hugh. Don't you remember?
#NoHearingsNoVotes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.