Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 31. sij
  2. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Because that’s what we all want... to hear more from these self-serving politicians while Dems continue to launch their impotent “bombshells”. 🙄🙄🙄

  3. 31. sij

    chose the right side of history. 👍

  4. 31. sij

    Another question for the Democrat managers: Since the "Whistleblower" does not meet the statutory definition of a whistleblower and so is not covered, why are you hiding him/her?

  5. 31. sij

    A question for the Democrat Managers: Where does the statute require a Whistleblower's identity to be kept secret?

  6. 31. sij

    Excellent question that should have been admissible. My questions: Why did Chief Justice Roberts censor it? Is it because he knows the "whistleblower?" Hmmm.

  7. OOPS! wasn't supposed to make closing arguments and was trying to stop him! EMBARRASSING. 😂 [Turn 🔊 on]

  8. 31. sij

    time to put an end to this sham impeachment trial.

  9. 31. sij

    Democrats have already called 17 witnesses and the Senate has heard from them. We do not need additional witnesses. No additional witnesses. End this now.

  10. 30. sij

    Hey, , It's time to end this ! The , so . There should be . Just vote to and get back to work! RT!

  11. 30. sij
  12. 30. sij

    Case closed stop this farce now

  13. . Democrats have already heard from 17 witnesses and they’ve got nothing. Retweet if you agree lawmakers go back to work for AMERICANS!

  14. 30. sij

    Standard authoritarian strategy: keep repeating the lie. The Dems know they have failed.

  15. How Schiff trust anything Bolton says after what he said about Bolton in the past?

  16. 29. sij
  17. 29. sij

    Mark Levin has a few questions for Republican Senators who might vote to call witnesses… – The Right Scoop

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.