Výsledky hledání
  1. před 20 hodinami

    “There is no public interest in perpetuating unlawful agency action” A federal judge has issued an injunction against proposed changes to from seen as a gag rule against physicians from mentioning abortions

  2. 26. 4.

    “The judge repeatedly asked how the new gag rule would improve health outcomes. The government was unable to answer." Thanks, , for fighting for the rights of patients and physicians.

  3. 25. 4.
  4. 24. 4.

    No one. No one gets between a patient and their doc having important discusssion to make fully informed choices.

  5. 24. 4.

    legal win for , , ... AND for patients and their healthcare providers. !

  6. 24. 4.

    Watch live as the ’s General Counsel, Brian Vandenberg, discusses right before the AMA argues in the courtroom on behalf of physicians’ freedom of speech.

  7. 24. 4.

    A U.S. district judge said Tuesday he will issue a temporary injunction against the administration’s gag rule dictating what physicians can and cannot say about family planning to their patients in the program.

  8. 23. 4.

    We're about to head into court to challenge the Administration's gag rule. Join us for a special Facebook Live broadcast before and after our lawyers argue in the courtroom on behalf of physicians’ freedom of speech.

  9. 23. 4.

    The ⁦⁩ is fighting for our 1st amend right. For patients’ right to hearing all their options. They r fighting for the health and safety of our patients. Hear what they have to say

  10. 23. 4.

    The new gag rule on physicians, doesn't . Instead, it dictates what information they can and can’t provide to their patients. Join our General Counsel for Live broadcast from the courthouse, immediately before and after oral arguments.

  11. 20. 4.

    This choses to get involved in the legal battle against the government’s gag rule. It matters so much for physicians and their patients.

  12. 19. 4.

    A family physician for more than 30 years, Tom Ewing, MD, of Eugene, Oregon, is battling the government's gag rule as a plaintiff alongside the AMA. Learn why Dr. Ewing finds it imperative that the government .

  13. 19. 4.

    The is headed to court to stand up for physicians' freedom of speech in a case against the new gag rule. Live broadcast from the courthouse, immediately before and after oral arguments.

  14. 20. 3.

    seeks to have the new rule declared unconstitutional and is seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions against implementing the rule, which is set to take effect May of this year.

  15. 12. 3.

    The result of the new rule, if implemented, “will be a national public health crisis in short order."

  16. 11. 3.

    . legal experts on the new federal regulations and the gag rule imposed on physicians – and why the AMA has filed a suit to stop it.

  17. 10. 3.

    The patient-physician relationship relies on trust, open conversation and informed decision-making. The government should not be telling physicians what they can and cannot say to their patients.

  18. 7. 3.

    Gag orders that stop physicians from explaining all options to their patients and referring them for additional care are unacceptable and unethical. That’s why we filed suit to stop it.

  19. 6. 3.

    The freedom of communication between patients and their physicians – and the trust upon which it is built – lies at the center of effective health care. The new regulation attempts to undermine that sacred relationship.

    Approved images for initial Title X communications
  20. 6. 3.

    Note: It is a very big deal that the American Medical Association is suing to block the new rules that interfer with the doctor-patient relationship. We should all thank them.

    Zobrazit toto vlákno

Načítání se zjevně nějak vleče.

Možná je překročena kapacita Twitteru nebo došlo k momentálnímu zablokování. Zkuste to znovu nebo se podívejte na stavovou stránku Twitteru, kde najdete další informace.