Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 1. svi 2018.

    Editors like to receive the rejection comments from the other journals where it has been rejected. Will save time and the peer review pool is small (yes, you'll run into them again!)

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
  2. 23. ruj 2019.

    A good analysis on the

    1:48
    As ends we thank our editors & reviewers for their dedication and hard work: building impactful journals and exciting futures for their fields. See our Head of Publishing Operations explain our collaborative review:
  3. 28. lis 2019.

    Did you know? we have a whole section of our website dedicated to the results of the . It lists and allows you to access all and developed through the project. They can be found here:

    4 proslijeđena tweeta 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
  4. 24. ožu 2017.

    Interesting questions about publishing negative findings at conference this afternoon

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
  5. 6. kol 2019.

    *submission. Indexed by Garuda, Google Scholar, Mendeley, Crossref. Click the link for more information.(me)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 1. svi 2018.

    presubmission inquiries can save a lot of effort down the road.

  7. 18. lip 2014.

    Proof reading my draft for . Hope it materializes.

  8. 15. srp 2017.

    A published by our doctors in , Vol 7, Issue 1, on visit @http://bit.ly/2tdyc2M

  9. 30. sij

    Research Scholars make a note on this! …

  10. 27. sij

    VITRS helps you to attain your Ph.D Dreams!

  11. 9. pro 2019.

    Anonymous peer review should be also considered in . The reviewers do not need to know the name of the authors. Unnecessary.

    I am so happy to see considering dual anonymous peer review! It works for and would improve the process for proposers and for reviewers. I served on a panel and it was fun because we spent the whole time discussing science instead of the proposers.
    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
  12. 6. svi 2019.

    And after all the energy spent on , in most of the cases, the paper gets rejected. Thus starts another round of formatting for the next journal.

    Dear Journal Editors, Why do we need all the crazy formatting rules just to submit a paper? Why can’t manuscripts be formatted to your esoteric format after they are accepted? Sincerely, Everyone who has ever submitted a manuscript
    Prikaži ovu nit
    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
  13. 22. tra 2019.

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
  14. 4. tra 2019.

    The new domain name journalpublications .com has been listed for sale at , buy it before its gone! click here:

  15. 26. velj 2019.

    @ Delhi, India

  16. 19. pro 2018.

    Satisfying to produce some from . This work was published in #2017 & still is article of !

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
  17. 18. svi 2018.

    vs : Which is the better publication route?..

  18. 11. lip 2017.

  19. 25. ožu 2017.

    with more than 1 impact factor and growing

  20. 15. lis 2016.

    Higher levels of editing and comments for mentoring authors. John Linnegan

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa

Nema rezultata.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.