Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 30. sij

    Yes! LIED in the floor of the a Senate. He’s LIED all throughout the . is a fraud. A dirty Politician! He is a disgrace to the entire Congress!

  2. 31. sij

    Well, it’s done. Except for Collins and Romney, 51 Senators voted for a . Now it’s back in the hands of the House to vote to start a new so they can bring in the new witnesses for public hearings. Let’s keep the Senate busy.

  3. The Democrats are probably in the preliminaries of 2.0!! (remember they stated, they will keep up Impeachment) until they lose majority in the House. But doing the same thing, an expect a different result is the definition of Insanity.

  4. 4. velj

    It was all a setup from the beginning. You have to ask, why do they want impeached before he even took office?? Democrats care nothing about the people!

  5. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Here's hoping for a Trump 2.0.

  6. 3. velj

    is up & naming the often unnamed staff who supported the & saying they are “brillinat, hard working, patriotic” & have endured threats. Shameful.

  7. 3. velj

    same goes for you, should’ve taken time in . The are not to do the work for you, should’ve called witnesses and brought this to trial with you? What you just said in the Senate, you people aren’t quitting this

  8. 3. velj

    You all should have taken your time in the calling witnesses...etc. When you go to trial you do not have your opponent set up witnesses for you or do the trial for you, that’s what you all want the Senate to do? Not going to happen.

  9. 2. velj

    Calling what we just saw an "acquittal" is about as accurate as calling it a "trial".

  10. 2. velj

    After the , after the , we have seen a glimpse of what America will look like if Democrats are given more power. Due Process will only be afforded to the innocent — and they get to decide who is innocent.

  11. 1. velj

    When motives become impeachable, that would streamline Impeachments. At the onset of The , just put the person charged under a lie detector test, and if his motives are abrasive, Hang the Son of a Bitch.

  12. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The White House is blocking sales of his book. I wonder if the House opens another , this one for Obstruction of Judtice, and subpoena Bolton, they'd suddenly release that hold.

  13. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Looks like you should have opened your mouth when the House Dems had the most unfair and unconstitutional in our history!

  14. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Investigate Nunes on the way? How compromised was the with Nunes, his Derek Harvey, his pal Kash Patel and HPSCI. Patel is WH but he's in Nunes' "Objective Medusa" [his b.s. off the books "congressional" investigation designed to promote Trump & hurt us.

  15. 31. sij

    “It’s over, “We warned them,” , speaking about House Democrats during the Ratcliffe says House Republicans warned House Democrats they didn’t have enough evidence.

  16. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Sounds like with respect to the in the House.

  17. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    HOW MANY WITNESSES DID THE CONGRESS CALL IN THEIR BEFORE CONCLUDING THAT THEIR CASE WAS COMPLETED? If they needed more witnesses why did they cut short the investigation & seek ? PARTISAN POLITICS IS DANGEROUS

  18. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Start another in the House on Monday

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.