Search results
  1. People View all

  2. Replying to and

    Also, the has cited 6000 reports on climate change reviewed by over 90 international climate science researchers who stand to gain very little by misrepresenting the truth and who face hostile reception by powerful fossilfuel industry wanting emissions unabated.

  3. Jan 4

    Get ready for 's Town Hall on the Environment by joining on Tues. Jan. 15 to discuss the , watch Greta Thunberg’s "Save the World by Changing the Rules" and learn about the Lancet Countdown 2018 Report:

  4. 14 hours ago
    Replying to

    The have got the Government Jobs & the Government Funding

  5. 2 hours ago

    In 2019, I demand government—at all levels—aggressively legislate in a way prioritizes fighting and . No more equivocation. I want to see strident .

  6. 3 hours ago
    Replying to

    and have given developing countries free ride to burn coal and fossil fuels until 2030 then UN will impose CO2 tax on Brazil China India Pakistan Iran Nigeria etc.

  7. 4 hours ago

    details the rise in by the likes of and Larry Fink of in light of the powerful study, and calls for the radical transformation of business

  8. Jan 2

    Expert review of two special reports ending soon! Deadline to register for oceans and cryosphere review 4 Jan, deadline to register for land use review 7 Jan Please share your expertise

  9. 26 Dec 2018

    being a self appointed suppository of knowledge, and having previously declared Global warming has more positives than negatives? Can you kindly point to which parts of Australia will be the winners from your claim?

  10. 1 of 3. Just have a think for a moment how connected to the world and how reliant on those connections we are in . Even if the consistently understated range of risk presented by proves realistic, the world is on a trajectory to get beyond ugly & conflict ridden.

  11. 19 hours ago

    The 2016 official complaint against , buried & replaced & involving no less than 10 corrupt officers, remains open & unresolved due to its collusion with the then .

  12. 21 hours ago

    We need to treat climate breakdown as an ongoing proposal. Don't start with "Do you support this 70% tax?". Start with "do you support exposing hundreds of millions of additional people to hunger, superstorms, floods, and disease?" Start there.

  13. Jan 3

    Pretty balanced. At least they’re treating the crisis seriously. Even mentioned the 12 year time frame.

  14. 30 Dec 2018
    Replying to and

    ...as its mission to instrumentalize the ademocratic prejudices & unholy ambitions of the unelected, unaccountable, supra-national Apparat of the , the and other arms of anti-Enlightenment Marxism inexorably creeps ever further beyond the CBs’ original, narrow ‘mandate’.

  15. 13 hours ago

    If I lived in a rural area (fyi this is probably in my near-term future) I'd still insist on decarbonizing, no matter the cost. I'm on disability, it's not like I'm even middle class. We have to make massive changes anyway.

  16. Jan 4
    Replying to and

    Models actually predict and can be compared to real data. We have seen some dishonesty here on the part of the but it is all can do. Finding the most accuate model (and yes! they should invite contrarian hypotheses like to beat their models)

  17. Jan 1

    What's your alternative means to reduce our emissions? For now, forget about the recent report warning that we have 11 years to cut by 45%; just tell us how you'd like us to meet PM Harper's target of 30% reductions by 2030.

  18. 31 Dec 2018
    Replying to and

    Integrity is optional if you're a lying Chief Constable taking taxpayers for £214K pa. Ex Sawyer who can't get a simple timeline correct got a QPM and my MP who told me not to contact the about my 2012 police stitch up was knighted.

  19. Dec 31

    BAM! Navajo Nations first project is now producing enough electricity for 13,000 homes:

  20. 13 hours ago

    Fabulous summer holiday in NZ running, hiking and swimming. Now back to work for LAM2 in Vancouver.

  21. 17 hours ago

    Canadians who consider climate change the most important issue in this year’s federal election might want to consider voting for and the .

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.