Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 27. ruj 2018.
  2. 2. lip 2019.

    Love this! authorship criteria in Excel form, designed by Siu-wai Leung

  3. The revised guidelines put the onus on authors to update preprints and signpost readers to published versions

  4. 17. velj 2018.

    Many journals endorse requirements, but do they mean it?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  5. 1. tra 2018.

    Breaking news! , the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, bans the use of the term "statistically significant" in all papers. Thanks , , , , , et al. For details, see

  6. 24. ruj 2019.

    Did you know that many informationists work with teams as a co-author? See our co-authored publications here: - rock!

  7. 14. tra 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    More information on the inappropriate and evolution of authorship in the guidelines can be found here

  8. 13. srp 2018.
  9. 17. sij
  10. 21. lis 2019.

    I’m looking for examples of guidelines adapted to the context of research to ensure equitable representation. Any recommendations, or other global health researchers? If you want to read more about this:

  11. The official journal of the Indian Rheumatology Association. Committed to preserving and promoting the best standards in scientific publishing as per the and @vishiakshat

  12. 1. sij

    The NIH requires disclosures of “significant” financial conflicts — valued at more than $5,000 a year — because outside income from interested parties can potentially affect researchers’ objectivity... should demand this from editors.

  13. 28. sij

    has opened up the form for comments so that it reflects the evolution in how is perceived. Now's our chance to contribute!

  14. 4. srp 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I think while there are a lot of grey areas, disclosing financial COI should not be so complicated for psychologists. The criteria are pretty straightforward especially if you use the form. For non-financial COIs it's more complicated.

  15. 17. srp 2019.
  16. 4. stu 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    How frustrating was having got a reply our center did not deserve a role in the authorship after having participated to the study with 35 patients, according to the criteria

  17. Not sure I agree with this piece from the guidelines from say all authors take responsibility once published. I think this could encourage addition of authors who don’t meet criteria

  18. 9. sij

    The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors () recently released updated recommendations. An annotated PDF that identifies where changes have been made is available at .

  19. 2. stu 2019.

    Reumatizam is a peer reviewed, platinum rheumatology journal archived by HRČAK repository (). From 2019 onward, Digital Object Identifiers are assigned to all articles. The editors follow recommendations of the , CSE and .

  20. 2. stu 2019.

    4 main criteria for authorship->

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.