Search results
  1. People View all

  2. Jan 28

    Congratulations to and their workers on gaining entry to the UK with just 5 points and a grade G on Priti Patel’s new Australian points based immigration system. 🇨🇳

  3. Jan 28

    The 5G debate feels pretty sinophopbic to me. The whole 'we can't trust the Chinese' argument when you have companies like Facebook, Google etc. harvesting our personal data makes no sense.

  4. Jan 28
    Replying to

    NEVER trust authoritarian China! Ban !

  5. Jan 28

    Ok so in order to support the UK govt decision on we must accept that Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US have all got it wrong and we have got it right. 🤔

  6. Jan 28

    Britain has been using technology in its systems for the past 15 years, and security agencies believe that they can manage the risk with the network as they have done before.

  7. Jan 28

    One of the most stupid - and immoral - decisions of our time Would we have done deal with a Soviet company complicit with gulags, or a German company providing surveillance at Auschwitz? No. So why , which facilitates suppression of ?

  8. Given the many issues on which it would be possible to fall out with Trump, it seems a mistake to fall out with America on one of the few issues on which he's right.

  9. Jan 28
    Replying to

    How has twitter selected this as its top tweet under the hashtag when you don't know the difference between the US and China 😂

  10. A hugely disappointing and potentially dangerous decision by the Government and the Civil Service. is a threat to national security and endangers our world leading intelligence sharing relationship with Fives Eyes partners. should urgently re-assess.

  11. "U.K. to allow Huawei in 5G networks but not in 'core' parts" A quarantine is pointless- it's impossible to "contain" a major supplier to 1 part of a 5G network. The U.K.'s policy reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of 5G tech. (1/3)

    Show this thread
  12. Overwhelming concern from all sides of the House. Quite clear that a positive Huawei decision would fly in the face of common sense.

  13. Jan 27
  14. is an extension of the Chinese government and a part of Beijing’s explicit “civil-military fusion” strategy, where government and industry work together to expand the power and influence of the Chinese Communist Party.

    Show this thread
  15. MPs including identifying the reasons behind U.K. Govt fudge as lack of investment in necessary infrastructure & a willingness to collude with deniers & to ignore threats when it suits them

  16. Our economic & intel relationship with UK important for both nations,especially our shared national security interests. Unfortunately,appears our close ally is about to be "penny wise, pound foolish" by allowing ’s into 5G infrastructure.

  17. Glad the is standing strong and rebuking the U.K. for adopting into its 5G networks. You can’t put a price tag on national security.

  18. Jan 28

    is there anything the won't do, at our expense, to look after their old boy network?

  19. For all the technical complexities, conclusion seems to me clear: all European countries, including UK, should exclude from their 5G, take the delay & money hit, & crucially, enable Ericsson & Nokia to become European/Western champions for key infrastructure of tomorrow.

  20. Jan 28

    Responding to the statement today: that the UK was left having to choose between so few 5G vendors is because of a decade of failed Tory industrial policy. The Government should support UK manufacturing and our tech sector to prevent such a situation happening again:

  21. There was a time when the British Government would decide who their telecoms networks providers were. Not decided by an American President or his proxies employed in the UK. If only we could Take Back Control. If only we were part of some influential European grouping😢😢

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.