Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Odgovor korisnicima

    The "case" developed by was horrible. Built on bad evidence; biased opinions & Partisan hatred drove Dems to foolishly Vote to Impeach, w/o real evidence of true offenses. Right Result: ❌ 𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 for a bold Christian Voice.

  2. prije 12 sati

    To Whom It May Concern will destroy everything you love. ❤️ Touch lives. Change the world. @ The Cathedral of Nine

  3. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    It strikes me that the only hearsay at this trial is the hearsay that Trump may have had non-corrupt motives--and that they could override his corrupt motives. The corruption is well documented.

  4. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    He said. He said.

  5. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    If you proved your case, why would you need more witnesses?? is not proof.

  6. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The only way to find out if the death toll is under stated, would be to compare seasonally adjusted funeral home and crematory numbers. I Heard reports they are working overtime.

  7. 31. sij

    STOP.... why are we allowed to use a liberal news media to be submitted into a trial. It’s all and it’s Pardison. it’s not a fact. 🇺🇸

  8. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Please continue ur lies to the ppl

  9. If only these Senators had a way to hear the answers directly. Don't look to Jim Jordan for that answer.

  10. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Considering when the impeachment started - 2016 and over 3 years trying to manufacture a reason, partly spent in the SCIFF with and the - and still using for evidence today. What is relevant? Is aka: the ?

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.