Search results
  1. 24 hours ago

    THE ANSWER TO "WILL YOU PACK ?" IS: "When the changed rules they now won't follow to steal a seat from President Obama and Neil , they put ALL options ON THE TABLE. If the GOP wants to undercut the American ppl, we can consider ANY option."

  2. Oct 7

    Consider a young person or small biz needs a way to process payments, they copy a snippet of code from free. PayPal makes money on the transaction fees. Same of The key is "future intent" of the code.

  3. Oct 4

    Really? Why do we need him or her? George is and will always be a federalist (which does not serve our nation well- ) and Kelly has traded her integrity/values to support a predator. So why do we need them-especially her?

  4. Oct 3
    Replying to

    Scalia didn't retire strategically, but he got his way anyway.

  5. is LITERALLY arguing that President's are elected for 4 years and therefore should be allowed to nominate a nominee for Supreme Court. Doesn't qualify it. Just says that point blank. So... reminder: . .

  6. Sep 30

    , , and were installed by a white supremacist who collaborated with Russia.

  7. Oct 2

    And to think I used to consider the one with the asterisk.

  8. 22 hours ago
    Replying to

    Hahaha. No darling ... YOU RUINED YOUR OWN REPUTATION WHEN YOU VOTED FOR AND ‼️‼️‼️‼️

  9. Sep 30

    You should the same to .

  10. Replying to

    Not necessarily. I have been surprised at some of ’s decisions. And and surprised us this summer. Although I’m not optimistic if is confirmed.

  11. Oct 2
    Replying to

    But it's not lawyers who decide cases (as you know) it's the judges. Over last 4 years has installed extremist unqualified judges on the bench who are loyal only to him. Besides it's going to & we'll need at least or to cross over w/ .

  12. 9 hours ago
  13. Oct 4
    Replying to

    or didn't hesitate to accept nominations. Character, ethics and judgment are in short supply in today's GOP.

  14. Sep 30
  15. Oct 2

    Zum größten Erfolg seiner bisherigen Präsidentschaft zählt für die Nominierung von zwei Richtern, und , für den Supreme Court. stellt euch den Obersten Gerichtshof vor:

  16. Replying to

    "Only I get to break laws" Thank you allegedly there is a of our highest court! Robert's, , , soon to be confirmed

  17. Oct 2

    Wouldn’t it be rich if this is true??? The rush to replace could have been the event that Trump comes into contact with positive asymptotic person and catches the virus. Hmm 🤔

  18. Oct 4
    Replying to

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.