Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 24. ožu 2019.

    A reference standard diet for the whole planet pictured by the Commission has no scientific justification at all, and would be deficient in several nutrients. That's all! Please, do not shift the attention to other economic or ethical questions

  2. This is no longer conspiracy theory - it's happening. Fake food & agri-food companies demonise meat & dairy, get rid of ruminants & thus top soil. Then only they can 'feed' the world - fake meat in labs, veg upside down indoors - the world becomes their (fake) oyster!

  3. 19. velj 2019.

    B R E A K I N G - ’s diet fails to help the planet, EAT Sci Director DeClerck admits. Wrote to me, “meat consumption limits proposed by the Commission were not set due to environmental considerations” but “only in light of health recommendations.” Make the truth public.

  4. 19. velj 2019.

    This EAT environmental revelation completely contradicts the entire premise of the report. I shared my research findings and received this admission two weeks ago and yet the events continue to promote their diet as being beneficial for the planet. Why?

  5. 28. stu 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 20. ruj 2019.

    University of Limerick soil scientist Prof Michael HB Hayes argues today in the that replacing red meat with grains and beans, as recommended by the commission, may endanger soil health.

  7. prije 7 sati

    Anmäl ett team till KliMATval - utvecklingsprogrammet som förenar forskning om mat & miljö med Innovationsguiden för användardriven innovation för hållbara lösningar inom livsmedelssystemet.

  8. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    For sure catastrophic for human health and inline with eugenic policies 😓 aka

  9. 1. velj

    Are healthy diets affordable? New research shows the reference diet aimed at improving global health and is too expensive for many around the world

  10. 31. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 31. sij

    Thank you for following our campaign. In case you have missed any of our delicious recipes this month we have collated them all here:

  12. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Here you can see that the recommends what the findings of that study (which has been misrepresented by Nina) recommend, i.e., more WHOLE plant foods. That doesn't mean fat or animal foods (types vary) are inherently unhealthy. Plant foods (types vary) are not either.

  13. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Nice! The planetary health diet still has animal products - just in much smaller quantities than most of us in countries like NZ eat.

  14. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Poorer, Memechek Et al. have some inconvenient truths corrupting the database. Especially when it comes to labelling the data.

  15. 30. sij

    He wasn’t forthcoming with the details and it’s clear why. I’ll add what actually recommends. Not all plant foods are equal but we knew that.

  16. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    As long as it's not misinformation....like much of the 'plant based only' or dramatically reduce animal based foods narrative.

  17. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    @, so you can see the results of your blind actions - get yourselves educated!

  18. 29. sij

    All the data in this are either outdated or grossly flawed. The 'experts' are non-experts. Wallace is a blogger who wrote the study is wrong because neglecting the choline in animal foods could have serious health consequences. Wallace also promotes dairy. A lot.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  19. 28. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Someone please tell please. Foisting this diet on everyone is giant (unpromising) experiment for the human race

  20. 27. sij

    In , editor responds to our work on cost of , calling it "a very important piece of work actually in that it casts new light on the sustainability, so to speak, of the planetary health diet". Thx !

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.