Search results

  1. People View all

  2. 6 hours ago

    's belated, garbled thread wishing away UN Commission finding, using evidence from OPCW, of chlorine attack on in April 2018. 1. Commission uses OPCW as well as its own sources 4 death toll of 49 & wounding of 650 ( doesn't realize this)

    6. The use of the word 'while' suggests that there is some sort of important counter-qualification to come. Without it, the section would read, baldly 'The Commission cannot make yet any conclusions concerning the exact causes of death' Which wouldn't like at all.
    5 replies 8 retweets 4 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  3. 4 hours ago

    I see still not realizing “quote” 1. Doesn’t comprehend “vast body of evidence” re chlorine, copters, munitions n April attack 2. Doesn’t understand UN Commission legal protocol 3. Doesn’t understand UNC relationship w upcoming OPCW final report

    2. It is not an 'attempt' to quote from the report. It is a series of referenced key direct quotations from the parts of the report central to the argument. This is a method you should try. If you can master it, you might grow up to be a real live scholar.
    3 replies 2 retweets 6 likes
  4. 6 hours ago

    2. Commission does not say -- yet --- that deaths are directly fm chlorine cuz OPCW is still investigating 4 final report ( doesn't realize this) 3. ignores findings re helicopters & munitions, both pointing to responsibility

    5 replies 7 retweets 5 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  5. 8 hours ago

    still failing to comprehend (or deliberately distorting): UN Commision report that chlorine was used on in April is based on OPCW findings & thus is "objective, testable info"

    Sweetie , 'uninformed' is a word you use a lot, but you must learn that it does not mean'holding a different opinion from .' They may be'drawing on' Das Kapital for all I care. They have not been to Douma (ask them) and they have no objective, testable information.
    6 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
  6. 4 hours ago

    Same scenario as in or “chemical attack”: the ⁦⁩ obvious fakes are being actively spread by Western media. One must be totally brainwashed and deprived of common sense to believe in such pathetic crap!

    5 replies 8 retweets 13 likes
  7. 9 hours ago

    Uninformed and/or desperate from over & regime use of --- UN Commission is drawing on OPCW findings for this report

    Yes. But I also know that, unlike the OPCW, the UN CoI never went there. OPCW is fact. CoI is opinion. The fact that it is more recent does not make it more accurate. But it is amazingly helpful to warmongers who were disappointed by OPCW.
    4 replies 4 retweets 1 like
  8. 7 hours ago

    , unable to provide info to counter UN finding of chlorine attack on in April 2018... Now resorting to unsupported pro- propaganda line (conspiracy for US-UK "missile attacks", rather than reality of threatened -Assad attack on )

    2. But I do absolutely comprehend what is going on here. The OPCW interim report is an obstacle to a new round of missile attacks on Syria . Therefore those who want such attacks need to try to bury it , and confuse the public by concentrating on these second-hand claims.
    6 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
  9. 12 minutes ago

    Tweet from in 2013. Back then, and in 2016 campaign, he mocked US meddling in . In April 2018, just before , he said US would withdraw. So talked to ... But, hey, still time to prove you're not a stupid leader, Mr Trump.

    The terrorists in Syria are calling themselves REBELS and getting away with it because our leaders are so completely stupid!
  10. 7 hours ago

    1. UN Commission doesn't report "something wholly different" fm OPCW interim report of July 6, 2018 (I await evidence u can provide to contrary). 2. OPCW still investigating but Commission adds new OPCW findings: A) Chlorine used B) Helicopters carried out attack

    How can it be 'based upon it'? It says something wholly different. I don't think you can have read the OPCW report from Douma . Here it is, sweetie :
    1 reply 4 retweets 4 likes
  11. 6 hours ago

    1. Yes, your thread has numbers. 2. Yes, it is a belated attempt to quote from the report. 3. But your attempt to interpret it is nonsense and ignorant about both evidence and the process used by Commission and OPCW. Very best of days to you.

    A. Not sure why it is either 'belated'(I responded swiftly to your ignorant and inaccurate claims about the report), or 'garbled'. It is sequential, numbered, logical, contains necessary quotation Maybe it is you who are garbled.
    3 replies 4 retweets 4 likes
  12. Sep 13
    Replying to and

    Of course. This is the initial report. There will be more to come. In the mean time what is important is to understand that was a false flag & we must protect civilians from attacks from any side! Specially “us” in the west bombing 🙏🏼

    2 replies
  13. Sep 6

    US & France have both announced they will attack after fait accompli 'chemical' attack they say is surely coming. UK will follow under renewed mandate. That's full green lights now for for stage another fake as they did in . Bracing...

    33 replies 366 retweets 398 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  14. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Umm, no --- *still* unable to comprehend relationship tween UN Commission of Inquiry & forthcoming final report from OPCW on and chlorine attacks in April

  15. Sep 11

    How do we know that's a lie? The for the first time were able to go to to investigate at first hand & not on the basis of tainted reports from 'rebel' sources that 'we' fund. They found no evidence of a chemical attack. is setting us up for a war.

    1 reply
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  16. Sep 11
    Replying to and

    false flag attack was created by the White Helmets for their cameras. The found no evidence of chlorine or sarin. Creating TO INCRIMINATE an innocent Syrian government is a war crime, wouldn't you say?

    2 replies
  17. 3 hours ago
    Replying to

    was predicted shortly after ...seems can bomb again with out evidence as soon as trump tells her

  18. Sep 6

    report undermines claims of chemical attack in

    2 replies 3 retweets
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  19. Sep 10

    Wiser thoughts do seem to prevail on 's front bench: here's with a warning that in we may come under severe pressure to act rashly & prematurely as we did in April after :

    In the Commons today, I said that - if there are reports of a chemical weapons attack in Idlib over the coming weeks - the government must ensure the reports are independently verified and that Parliament has given its approval, before escalating British involvement in the war.
    1 reply
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  20. 6 hours ago

    We are told the Russian state 's up charges against dissident Experts. In the state breaks into their houses and trumps up charges against Experts.

  21. Sep 11

    Or take today's piece by : It promises new lies piled up on this: "After a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburb of in April, the US, UK and France launched more than 100 cruise missiles, but no attempt was made to hit Syrian or Russian air bases."

    1 reply 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  22. Sep 5
    Replying to

    Read Woodward's text carefully, note that the outlandish Trump claim very effectively holds down and secures to real lie in that passage: that 'Assad used chemical weapons' in and . If he's CIA, then that's standard fayre.

    2 replies 2 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.