Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 30. sij

    Seriously can’t see how Harvard can keep Alan Dershowitz as a law professor he teaches corruption

  2. 30. sij

    Today's legal argument will be that Donald Trump couldn't have committed any crimes because he doesn't understand that crime is illegal.

  3. 30. sij

    Read my latest that describes and condemns the antics of Alan Dershowitz last night as he twisted himself into a legal pretzel to defend the most notorious liar and self-interested man to ever occupy the Oval Office.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 30. sij

    Stephen Colbert can’t find the logic in

  5. 30. sij

    Schiff: "You can't solicit foreign interference. And the fact that you're unsuccessful in getting it doesn't exonerate you. A failed scheme doesn't make you innocent ... it just makes you unsuccessful. An unsuccessful CROOK"

  6. 30. sij

    If I steal a million dolllars with the mixed motives of giving it to a homeless shelter and buying myself a Jaguar - it's not a crime.

  7. 30. sij
  8. Republican Senators & Trump’s defense are literally trying to make the case *for* authoritarianism & tyranny. This has happened to the GOP in only 3 years, imagine what would happen in 4 more. LET THAT SINK IN AMERICA!

  9. 30. sij

    At this point a Dem should bribe an IRS official for Trumps tax records and say they did it in the public interest.

  10. 30. sij

    Using it would he perfectly acceptable for a President to order the arrest of a pedophile sex trafficker, seize all his files, have him murdered, and then use the obtained to blackmail the pedophile’s Harvard lawyer friend to argue that it was all OK.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 30. sij

    Sorry, but I just can't get over it. Hitler also believed that his actions were in the public interest of his people. Therefore it was his right to do what he did??? If you think so, you're either crazy or totalitarian or both. is dangerous!

  12. 30. sij

    The reason this is so insane is it gives the President a license to commit ANY CRIME By , Trump could have all of his opponents arrested or killed and it would be okay because he believed getting himself re-elected was in the public interest THAT = DICTATORSHIP

  13. 30. sij

    If I believe I was not committing a crime while I commit a crime, I can just tell the judge that and walk free. Ok professor.

  14. 30. sij

    Using argument I think robbing a bank is good for the interest of the people i represent (my family), so I should be able to rob a bank legally.

  15. 30. sij

    So Trump's defense is literally that he can shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it.

  16. 30. sij

    Republicans are arguing that we shouldn't allow FACTS, EVIDENCE and WITNESSES regarding Trump's alleged attempt to cheat in our election because it will take 'too long'. If the damn Constitution is in peril, there is no "too long"!

  17. 30. sij
  18. 30. sij

    It's sad, in a pathetic way, to watch the GOP beg for a return to a monarchy. Really there's no reason to ever vote Republican again.

  19. 30. sij

    Many people are saying that using I could have had Jeffrey Epstein arrested and murdered in prison to make sure I won re-election and it wouldn’t be impeachable because i just thought it would be in the national interest if certain things never came to light.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 30. sij

    New Presidential Oath I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States unless it isn’t in my self-interest.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.