Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 28. lis 2019.

    Musunuru: "I realize that, as a scientist, if I have a strong suspicion about something going on, I should talk to a journalist."

  2. 29. lis 2019.

    Designing gDNA while listening to some old love songs...

  3. Q at : How do you report on something in a different country that may ruin a person's life, may perhaps even be fatal?

  4. 28. lis 2019.

    Shockingly messy chromatograms. We do not know what health effects this genetic mosaicism will have, says

  5. 28. lis 2019.

    As someone who has done a lot of DNA sequencing, I am so surprised these results are part of this paper. When my results (from bacteria/non CRISPR expts) looked like this, I knew my experiment didn’t work. This is cringeworthy.

    Slide showing sequencing results for the CRISPR babies
    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 28. lis 2019.

    Musunuru says as soon as he saw the figures in the preliminary study he knew that the babies were real, and that "everything CRISPR could do wrong was happening here."

  7. 28. lis 2019.

    "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

  8. 28. lis 2019.

    Starting the morning off HOT with two big topics — genetic engineering and solar geoengineering

  9. 28. lis 2019.

    Physician scientist Kiran Musunuru said he learned that if he has a strong suspicion of unethical and threatening practices such as the “genetic vandalism” of the , he should tell a journalist.

  10. 28. lis 2019.

    That Kiran thinks nothing has changed about channels for raising alarm at the global level even after the scandal, to me, is a story (and concerning)

  11. 28. lis 2019.

    (My note) I’m not sure what to think of the fact that scientists think there is NO recourse to report unethical science happening anywhere. Should journalists be the only outlet?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. 28. lis 2019.

    Who do you tell when you find out something unethical is happening in research in another country? asks Musunru. Journalists are the ones to chase down these stories

  13. When UPenn professor looked at He Jiankui's data, he could "tell instantly that this was a disaster, everything you worried about CRISPR doing wrong happened here.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. 28. lis 2019.

    What is the obligation of the scientific community, some of whom were privy to JK’s experiments. Musurunu says it was a tricky situation with lots of hand-wringing. Who do you tell when something potentially unethical is happening in a diff country?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. If you weren’t at today, you should definitely catch up on . I knew He Jiankui’s work with the twins was problematic, unethical, and deeply concerning but... it goes way, way farther than that.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 28. lis 2019.

    Adjectives I’ve seen used to describe this session: “Riveting," “alarming,” “horrifying,” “shocking,” “spooky." . Well done,

  17. 28. lis 2019.

    “I was horrified. I don’t even have the words to describe how I feel about this,” says Kiran Musunuru about this .

    Prikaži ovu nit
  18. 28. lis 2019.

    With a challenging story like this, "it’s important to show readers how you know what you know," writes.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  19. 25. stu 2019.

    3/ I won’t recount the circumstances under which received the manuscript—it’s her story to tell, and she told it well at the session at shared his story at the same session, too.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 28. lis 2019.

    Thank you, Beryl Benderly, for asking “the grandma question”: What is wrong with these babies?

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.