Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Osobe Vidi sve

  2. The President, the Senate, & the American people deserve to know the facts about .

  3. On w : The Dems built their entire case on the proposition that it was baseless & a sham to investigate corruption surrounding . But a President is always justified and in fact has a responsibility to investigate credible evidence of corruption.

  4. The President was justified in investigating . Learn why:

  5. Pam Bondi’s arguments are so on point - she is blowing the door wide open - exposing how the media has chosen to ignore very serious allegations regarding VP Joe Biden, his son, and the Ukrainian connection Facts def matter

  6. Why should the American people care about Hunter Biden & ? The answer is simple: there is significant evidence of corruption. WATCH Pam Bondi break down . ⤵️

  7. 27. sij

    Pam Bondi is going to get Hunter Biden SUBPOENAED!!! Where the hell is Hunter Biden?!? Why was he on the board of Burisma? He knew nothing, not even the language! Yet he brought back millions of dollars, on AF2 with BRING HUNTER TO TRIAL NOW.

  8. prije 58 minuta
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
  9. prije 1 sat

    Seriously. Amid the impeachment insanity, the incessant allusions to - the most shameless attempt by a foreign government to buy influence with an American administration in history - made Iowa Dems fear this issue will be disastrous for against .

  10. Hunter Biden's involvement raises significant issues of potential corruption. The President had a responsibility to investigate .

  11. prije 3 sata

    succeeded in what he set out to do, he discredited Biden enough to make people not vote for him. Our President is smart and IS above the law so you have to get over it if you don’t like it.

  12. prije 9 sati
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Worthless-

  13. prije 9 sati

    John Kerry implicates the entire Administration as essentially backing the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor.

  14. Geometry: "Similar Triangles": $1B withheld aid to fire Ukrainian prosecutor investigating = $330M in aid alledgedly withheld to force investigation into . So, remove the latter, but elect the former? Ain't buyin' it !

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Is what Hunter Biden did in considered corruption? If your taxpayer dollars are going to a Ukrainian government which supports corruption, is it wrong to ask about it? If it hadn't been Hunter Biden would it have been OK to ask about it?

  16. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    How about investigate using the same approach and vigor? 's son pulled in $83K per month sitting on the board of a money laundering gas company in the Ukraine. bragged that he withheld $1B in aid unless Ukraine fired investigator.

  17. 3. velj

    C'mon : "House brought an iron clad case" - why do they need more witnesses :) "Trump put his interests ahead of country"-which is why he takes no salary :) "Trump asked foreign nation to interfere in our elections" -he asked about .

  18. 3. velj

    Does the president not have the authority to investigate corruption???

  19. The President had a responsibility to investigate . Here’s why:

  20. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Amazing the people he insults, that for whatever their reasons, don’t interrupt him, stop him straight in his tracks, especially given there’s no shortage to counterpunch with

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.