Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 12. stu 2019.

    Full house tonight at on genome editing in humans. Many difficult questions posed on ethics, (global?) governance and implications for healthcare, which we all - industry, academia, patients and society as a whole - need to think carefully about.

  2. 12. stu 2019.

    Great . Honestly one of the best bioethics debates I've attended.

  3. 12. stu 2019.

    Great to make the end of the debate on the quest for the perfect human - is it even the right question?

  4. 22. stu 2019.

    After the at the re the quest for the perfect human, fascinating to listen to this week’s Radio 4 Moral Maze on the morality of genetics

  5. 12. stu 2019.

    From straight to an exciting debate on human genome editing with a stellar panel and probing questions from the audience. So much scientific promise and many ethical challenges to consider

  6. 12. stu 2019.

    Interesting evening for debate on human with panel Prof Robin Lovell Badge and Rodger Novak organised by ⁦⁩ Definitely a subject that needs more open discussions

  7. 12. stu 2019.

    PET’s chair of trustees Robin Lovell-Badge outlines how editing should be regulated

  8. Loads of energy in a full room for debate on the implications of human editing

  9. 12. stu 2019.

    Dr Rodger Novak outlines that new payment models are required for these novel therapeutics - suggesting an outcomes based approach

  10. 12. stu 2019.

    outlining financial implications of long term monitoring for patients, challenges of gene hacking and ramifications for the NHS

  11. 13. stu 2019.

    A joy & honour to have been impresario to “The quest for the perfect human..?” gene-editing debate sponsored by among Prof Robin Lovell-Badge & Rodger Novak , superbly chaired by

  12. Our 2016 survey found patients overwhelmingly support editing research for treating medical conditions. Survey found almost half of general public respondents supportive. What’s your view?

  13. 12. stu 2019.

    Speaker talks about the permanent nature of the changes made by editing and how different it is from drug discovery which aims NOT to change DNA

  14. 13. stu 2019.

    I was so pleased by the quality of yesterday's on human genome editing: not only our panellists' expert and profound insights, but also the contributions from the many distinguished members of the audience. Thank you to all. The debate continues...

  15. 5. pro 2019.

    We ran a survey about genome and germline editing techniques. We found out religion doesn’t influence answers, but level of education does. Read the survey results

  16. 21. stu 2019.

    Would you agree to the use of germline editing techniques for non-medical purposes? We asked 2000 British people and 48% said NO. Read our survey at

  17. 28. stu 2019.

    We asked people if they agree with editing genes in embryos to cure a life-threatening disease: 49% agree, 10% disagree. To read the full survey :

  18. 12. stu 2019.

    The first speaker explains what genome editing is at

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.