Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 2. velj

    83K a month is NOT OK. should want to be exonerated.

  2. prije 13 sati
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This is really sad. 1) that’s what reporters are supposed to do; ask the question. 2) it’s your choice to answer or not. His response (not an answer) shows his guilt. If no one is above the law, I really do hope that’s proven in the case of

  3. 28. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I swear a second ago that said McKay supported ... then it refreshed to this.

  4. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    And there you go, the Dems that lose always go to court for the life ring.

  5. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    In the remote chance Biden wins impeachment is inevitable. Either way are screwed. It’s clear is real and it’s a political offense everyone will understand.

  6. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    GET THE FIRE MARSHALL! 🔥 🔥 We don’t want anyone carking it in a bloody stampede tragedy!!!

  7. 2. velj

    After this impeachment process is over, I saw we investigate every elected member of every national office for relatives with a sweetheart deal like

  8. 1. velj
  9. 1. velj

    “We were expected to be absolutely outraged that President Trump asked Ukraine to investigate a matter that journalists in the US have themselves been investigating.” Until they weren’t. Because 🍊Man bad. Forget about Joe fine with million$.

  10. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The difference is that Trump will be happy for many more years and Hunter Biden's time is limited

  11. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Start the investigation ,,

  12. 31. sij

    Biden campaign spokeswoman pressed by Ed Henry on and

  13. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    And a VP who was supposed 2 bugger out Ukraine corruption but instead tipped his loser son Hunter 2 endulge & profit in it! This is the scam that went wrong!

  14. 30. sij
  15. 30. sij

    He’s no “whistleblower. He’s a felony leaker. And now it looks like he was engaged in CYA for his own corruption as Biden’s acolyte. : Witness time: Did have a conflict of interest on Ukraine's Burisma?

  16. 30. sij

    They said there wasn't a shred of evidence of corruption We've just seen 2 HOURS of evidence.

  17. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Let’s get this investigation party started now. Better late than never!

  18. 30. sij

    Val Demings is LYING. The timeline is out there & COMPLETELY refutes her case.

  19. 29. sij

    So with a new Ukrainian supposed reform president it was a good time to bring it up. Joe Biden announced in April. MSM had done stories on in March, June, WaPo just a few days before Trump’s 2nd call to Zelensky in July.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 29. sij

    Good explanation by Trump lawyer Philbin on why when Trump became aware of . Rudy had been investigating the 2016 election interference and Burisma surfaced. Poroshenko, who Biden got to fire the prosecutor was still in office until spring election of Zelensky.

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.