Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. And while you’re at it, if you’re concerned about promoting “electable” consensus candidates, , consider using in your future primaries.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. I guarantee that if the Iowa caucus had used , would have polled at the very top. Everyone likes him, even the 78 y.o. dude at my precinct who said, "this country will never support a UBI, but I like him anyway." Even the racist lady liked him.

  3. Odgovor korisnicima

    What do you mean by “existing primaries?” And also, why stop there? (Also has awesome resources if you’re interested)

  4. Quirky, quaint historic traditions are not acceptable for votes with national impact. It is long past time for national electoral reform.

  5. It's your last chance to vote in our "Best Picture" poll! Who should win best picture, if the Academy used approval voting?

  6. prije 21 sat

    All primaries on one day

  7. 5. velj

    This is why ranked systems aren’t spreading like wildfire to fix our broken electoral processes. Only can fix this.

  8. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Assuming you mean “instant runoff” instead of other ranked choice methods… versus plurality voting? No. Versus other methods like ? There are tradeoffs to consider.

  9. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    What if Iowa just used

  10. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    My understanding was that it was an awareness campaign for , per . (I’m personally behind , which I consider to be a type of score voting, allowing only 0s and 1s.)

  11. 4. velj

    This wouldn't solve the mess at the , but they really ought to be using .

  12. 4. velj

    🇺🇸 Every vote in is public, and yet 🇺🇸 3 caucus results are difficult to report, even with specialized software, but 🇺🇸 Machines should not be necessary to count votes, and 🇺🇸 No voter should be incapable of understanding how their votes are counted 🐝

  13. 4. velj

    In what twisted universe do we need SPECIALIZED SOFTWARE to count votes?? If the count can’t be understood and tabulated by an everyday voter, how on earth can they trust the results? We shouldn’t need to pay private companies to run our democracy. (PS: look up )

  14. 4. velj

    would have given us and quick and clear results that show true levels of support for every candidate (not just those who didn’t get eliminated), and would have propelled candidates more people agree on to the front of the race.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. 3. velj

    The are today! Here are the current results for our (just for fun) approval voting poll. Though these results are not a representative sample, it shows what election results could look like if was used in our primaries.

  16. 3. velj

    I feel so bad for Iowans right now. Until the primaries upgrade their voting method (preferably to ) we’re stuck with misrepresenting the complexities of electability and become increasingly polarized. Best we can do now: Learn about the candidates...

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. 2. velj

    Everyone knows our is broken, and everyone wants with results that truly represent them. is completely non-partisan, and could help save the country . How it works:

  18. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I know this is entirely too late in the game now... but changing the voting method from plurality voting to would enable voters with more progressive views to vote for both Warren and Bernie Sanders in the primaries.

  19. 1. velj

    Everywhere we go, we find that as soon as people find out about , they immediately want it. Thank you to the League of Women Voters of Metro St. Louis for endorsing

  20. 1. velj

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.