Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 28. kol 2019.

    How do you draw conclusions from your results? I`m working on a stats tutorial for and it would be a great deal of help if you could complete this short (3-4 mins) questionnaire.

  2. 22. sij 2018.

    Our article on open sharing of dyadic data is now online. Looks like it gets to be the very first paper in this new journal!

  3. Now in press at "The Epistemic Importance of Establishing the Absence of an Effect" - -

  4. 13. kol 2018.

    That strange sensation when you realise you're looking forward to reading about stats...

  5. 26. svi 2018.

    forum on expert panel. Really emphasising that we need to train people how to share data and build a culture in the next generation where people share data as the norm. – mjesto: Yosemite B

  6. 7. kol 2017.

    This does make signing up as a reviewer for slightly complicated..

  7. 21. stu 2017.

    61 analysts in 29 teams analyse the same dataset. 20 teams found a significant effect, 9 did not: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results via

  8. 27. srp 2016.

    I installed successfully via , but there's no option to 'Add New' theme or plugin. Anyone has an idea? Thanks

  9. 7. ožu 2016.

    I just installed via and i just love it <3

  10. 20. pro 2019.

    I just upgraded on via

  11. 14. ruj 2019.

    Just wanted to note that has many good articles this issue (including the one in this tweet). I tried to tweet the full issue but couldn’t-so definitely have a look at the TOC for this issue.

  12. 27. kol 2019.

    How can I model the predictions of my theory to calculate the Bayes factor? Here are some heuristics from Zoltan Dienes (paper is in press in ):

  13. In an analysis of 30 intro textbooks, scientists based at the University of Guelph found that the vast majority defined or explained statistical significance inaccurately

  14. . & Lara Ditrich found that social research articles published in 2016 & 2018 had larger sample sizes compared with articles published in 2009 & 2011

  15. Insights From High-Risk Fields Can Help Minimize Mistakes in the Lab. Recent article in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

  16. 11. velj 2019.

    I just installed via going to attempt to make my own custom theme for my portfolio site :)

  17. How researchers can find different results using the same data

  18. Check out the September Issue of Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, including two RRRs

  19. 7. ruj 2018.

    It was great to be part of this large scale replication effort -- published recently at . The results show no evidence for moral reminders reduce cheating -- only one experiment returned significant result (in the opposite direction). :

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.