Search results
  1. Oct 17

    . & voted against qualified gay nominee for Ambassador to Germany. Now they are already on-record opposing qualified gay nominee Patrick Bumatay for the . Even worse? Both are THEIR CONSTITUENTS.

    397 replies 4,470 retweets 5,689 likes
  2. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Are we surprised that democrat-run urban municipalities (thru policy) create environments ripe for debauchery & lawlessness. Then liberal judges release repeat/violent offenders back into society completing the cycle

    2 likes
  3. Nov 22
    Replying to

    Bring it on!

    1 reply 3 retweets 39 likes
  4. Nov 21

    . on the Ruling: “Donald Trump is trying to protect our border, this is a national security issue… the 9th circuit has a different opinion on that… truth is, congress needs to act. Our immigration laws are broken.”

    29 replies 167 retweets 451 likes
  5. Apr 9

    Big ruling from in SF: women can't be paid less than men for same work just because they have a history of lower salaries. Unanimous 11-0 ruling (written by Judge Reinhardt just before he died)

    8 replies 121 retweets 232 likes
  6. Nov 22

    So takes a swing at the thereby causing the Chief Justice to release some PR boilerplate in defense of the judiciary. What Roberts said was self-evidently false, but the praise is heaped on him. Why are falsehoods so popular while candor is condemned?

    2 replies 15 retweets 14 likes
  7. Oct 15

    . nominates Patrick Bumatay to the United States Court of Appeals for the . If confirmed, Bumatay would become "the second openly gay federal appeals court judge in the nation"

    7 replies 66 retweets 129 likes
  8. Jul 28

    Trump welcomes LGBT group's help in court picks; 11 recommended by Log Cabin Republicans for

    8 replies 30 retweets 77 likes
  9. Nov 22

    Safety at the Border! "; they know nothing about it & making our Country unsafe. Our great Law Enforcement professionals MUST BE ALLOWED TO DO THEIR JOB! If not there will be only bedlam, chaos, injury and death. We want the Constitution as written!"

    3 replies 10 retweets 18 likes
  10. Apr 9

    The Court of Appeals lost it's 'Liberal Edge' with the death of Stephen Reinhardt last week. POTUS has a chance to shift this court with 6 vacancies a bit back to conservatism🤞 A chance to "..let the spirit of liberalism be extinguished."🤗

    3 retweets 7 likes
  11. Nov 25

    "Even though Pres. Trump does say outrageous things, he resonates with Republicans. Because we've seen the courts hijack our Democracy..and take over and make decisions that were supposed to be left to the People to make." on discussion on .

    5 retweets 9 likes
  12. Nov 21
    Replying to

    If this is true, why do Democrats always shop their cases to the ?

    2 replies 8 retweets 52 likes
  13. Nov 22

    “You have the president of the United Sates acting as a banana republic demagogue.” - on

    TRUMP BRINGS UP POLITICS WITH COMMANDERS, TROOPS
    See more at edition.cnn.com
    10 replies 62 retweets 188 likes
  14. Nov 21
    Replying to and

    Absolutely correct! U cannot pick n choose which law applies to who & this is exactly what’s happening today. I think it’s called elitist protectionism. There is & for a reason! & more

    7 retweets 9 likes
  15. Jul 24

    Read the whole thread by , which provides a clear and concise summary of this notable ruling by the (authored by my former boss, Judge O'Scannlain).

    1/ Divided 9th Circuit panel finds that 2nd Amendment "Second Amendment encompasses the right of a responsible law-abiding citizen to carry a firearm openly for self-defense outside of the home" - J O'Scannlain & Ikuta in majority. J Clifton in dissent.
    Show this thread
    5 replies 48 retweets 67 likes
  16. Jul 24

    What a great day returns! affirms the and !

    2 retweets 6 likes
  17. Oct 19

    Log Cabin Republicans submits letter to Chairman and the formally supporting the confirmation of Patrick Bumatay to the United States Court of Appeals for the

    2 replies 12 retweets 44 likes
  18. Feb 26

    What a great day in the fight for a world free from ! upheld prostitution laws again. As the court already affirmed, the state has a "substantial interest" in preventing violence against women and sex trafficking.

    In the petition for rehearing en banc by the full 9th Circuit for the California prostitution case (ESPLER v GASCON) , the motion was DENIED today. This is a big victory for the anti-sexual exploitation movement!
    1 reply 12 retweets 21 likes
  19. Jan 10

    And we don’t need them in the courts either. The needs to be brought to heel. How is it that one keeps stopping the of the ? There is something very wrong with the continued interference of these Judges.

    5 retweets 15 likes
  20. Feb 27

    & did a favor in preventing Administration from ending Because neither nor knew what they’re willing to give up in a compromise-This gives kids a reprieve-but also prevents any movement on southern border wall.

    62 replies 13 retweets 59 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.