Search results
  1. People View all

  2. . & voted against qualified gay nominee for Ambassador to Germany. Now they are already on-record opposing qualified gay nominee Patrick Bumatay for the . Even worse? Both are THEIR CONSTITUENTS.

  3. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Are we surprised that democrat-run urban municipalities (thru policy) create environments ripe for debauchery & lawlessness. Then liberal judges release repeat/violent offenders back into society completing the cycle

  4. Replying to
  5. Nov 21

    . on the Ruling: “Donald Trump is trying to protect our border, this is a national security issue… the 9th circuit has a different opinion on that… truth is, congress needs to act. Our immigration laws are broken.”

  6. Apr 9

    Big ruling from in SF: women can't be paid less than men for same work just because they have a history of lower salaries. Unanimous 11-0 ruling (written by Judge Reinhardt just before he died)

  7. Nov 22

    So takes a swing at the thereby causing the Chief Justice to release some PR boilerplate in defense of the judiciary. What Roberts said was self-evidently false, but the praise is heaped on him. Why are falsehoods so popular while candor is condemned?

  8. . nominates Patrick Bumatay to the United States Court of Appeals for the . If confirmed, Bumatay would become "the second openly gay federal appeals court judge in the nation"

  9. Nov 22

    Safety at the Border! "; they know nothing about it & making our Country unsafe. Our great Law Enforcement professionals MUST BE ALLOWED TO DO THEIR JOB! If not there will be only bedlam, chaos, injury and death. We want the Constitution as written!"

  10. Apr 9

    The Court of Appeals lost it's 'Liberal Edge' with the death of Stephen Reinhardt last week. POTUS has a chance to shift this court with 6 vacancies a bit back to conservatism🤞 A chance to "..let the spirit of liberalism be extinguished."🤗

  11. Nov 25

    "Even though Pres. Trump does say outrageous things, he resonates with Republicans. Because we've seen the courts hijack our Democracy..and take over and make decisions that were supposed to be left to the People to make." on discussion on .

  12. Nov 21
    Replying to

    If this is true, why do Democrats always shop their cases to the ?

  13. Nov 22

    “You have the president of the United Sates acting as a banana republic demagogue.” - on

  14. Nov 21
    Replying to and

    Absolutely correct! U cannot pick n choose which law applies to who & this is exactly what’s happening today. I think it’s called elitist protectionism. There is & for a reason! & more

  15. Jul 24

    Read the whole thread by , which provides a clear and concise summary of this notable ruling by the (authored by my former boss, Judge O'Scannlain).

  16. Jul 24

    What a great day returns! affirms the and !

  17. Log Cabin Republicans submits letter to Chairman and the formally supporting the confirmation of Patrick Bumatay to the United States Court of Appeals for the

  18. Feb 26

    What a great day in the fight for a world free from ! upheld prostitution laws again. As the court already affirmed, the state has a "substantial interest" in preventing violence against women and sex trafficking.

  19. And we don’t need them in the courts either. The needs to be brought to heel. How is it that one keeps stopping the of the ? There is something very wrong with the continued interference of these Judges.

  20. Feb 27

    & did a favor in preventing Administration from ending Because neither nor knew what they’re willing to give up in a compromise-This gives kids a reprieve-but also prevents any movement on southern border wall.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.