Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Osobe Vidi sve

  2. 31. sij

    A historically rigorous and principled response to AHR editor Lichtenstein's defense of the .

  3. Apparently, while I was presenting on the to a sold-out Chicago crowd, something interesting happened at the impeachment hearing. Amazing that this project will now be part of the congressional record of DJT’s impeachment. I am HONORED.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 30. sij
  5. 28. sij

    Oooh this is getting personal, Trump's lawyers taking postshots at revisionist views of Redonstruction and the !

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. The is back in stock for the FINAL time. If you wanted to get it, now is your chance.

  7. 30. sij

    If you didn't lock in on the first two presses you have one more opportunity to purchase DO NOT MISS OUT ON THIS!!!

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. I’m just now getting to this, but this was damn good. What I’ve loved about the debate around the is how it is bringing to the public a greater understanding of how history/historiography works, and that there’s never been such a thing as “objective” history.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. 31. sij

    A critical long read for your Friday morning: "Lichtenstein pretends that there is nothing at stake in this debate. Yet the imposition on history of a racialist narrative must have contemporary political consequences."

  10. prije 1 sat

    I'm shocked, shocked that contributor ZZ Packer would misleadingly quote Robert C. McMath, Jr.'s caricature of ZZ Packer's ideas, in a way that makes it look like he agrees with her. Who could have seen this coming?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 28. sij

    Speaker at tonight's meeting is addressing the . “the word ‘class’ does not make an appearance in the introductory essay by

    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. 1. velj

    The battle lines are becoming ever clearer as the debate over the continues. The latest salvo is discussed clearly and forcefully in this latest piece from the World Socialist Web Site.

  13. prije 12 sati

    Steven Soderbergh’s High Flying Bird: Sports and racial politics: Steven Soderbergh’s latest film High Flying Bird concerns itself with a fictional NBA lockout, but is essentially an accommodation to identity politics.

  14. An extremely important reply to the on the from and Tom Mackaman. Particularly important is the answer to the question: Why is the American Historical Review so insistent on defending claims that are indefensible?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. Teachers, enter to win a free class set of the during !

  16. 31. sij

    That is editorially defended in AHR, despite withering criticisms of professional historians, is a troubling development. It reveals the acceptance & even embrace of racialist mythology by a substantial section of the academic community...

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. 27. sij

    has inspired the 1619 Fest in Winter Park, Florida coming up in February. Congrats again to and everyone else who worked on the original monumental project

  18. prije 4 sata
  19. 27. sij

    Read the criticisms of the signed by 12 Civil War historians and political scientists, including Allen Guelzo and Peter Kolchin, which the refused to publish:

  20. And this here so perfectly sums up *why* the exists.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  21. 31. sij

    One of the many reasons why Matthew Desmond's essay should be retracted by the is its widespread misuse and misrepresentation of sources. That even includes sources in the New History of Capitalism literature, as the following passage illustrates:

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.