You can validly wrap the whole thing in `{{}}` (double block scope). The single line comment is a little cheating because you could technically put anything after the `//` so why stop there :p
-
-
-
The beauty is that the code is not fully parsed, which allows \\, and not fully exeucted, which allows __.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Give me emoji identifiers.
-
There is one that matches the JavaScript identifier criteria (L/M/Nd/etc) and is Emoji:
Works with and without VS-16.pic.twitter.com/fEaCrh0XH9
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
At first I thought "Sure, provided you have __, $$, and ಠಠ defined in scope" but nope, no need. The || short-circuits, so none of the identifiers in its right-hand operand is ever read. No ReferenceErrors here, move along...

- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You have reinvented perl!
-
And for this he must be punished
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hold on let me just rebase this PR
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
At some point on time, there might be a quiz show asking whether this was valid Perl, JS, both, or neither. :D
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.