Harry LitmanOvjeren akaunt

@harrylitman

Washington Post columnist. Former US Attorney, DOJ official.Teach con law at UCSD and UCLA. Practice law . Exec. prod. & host, .

La Jolla, San Diego
Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @harrylitman

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @harrylitman

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    Its been a fantastic 6 months and we are closing in our 500,000th unique listener; so we want to thank everyone and celebrate with a very bootleg episode: 7 feds in the best taqueria in Austin letting it fly over the topic, “Are we f***ed?” Link here:

    Poništi
  2. Poništi
  3. wow--who knew? B/t Trump Admin illegally destroying millions of pages of records to Congress's not wanting to pay for their storage, we have the permanent destruction of all sorts of materials, including details of ICE abuses.

    Poništi
  4. Poništi
  5. . too on the time to redouble plan, highlighting Bolton and Parnas: “For starters: One of the House committees should immediately invite former national security adviser John Bolton to testify, and if he refuses, subpoena him.”

    Poništi
  6. . counsels pedal to the medal, Inc pushing on subpoenas “No matter the ultimate vote in the Senate, the House’s Ukraine investigation was successful. It exposed rampant wrongdoing to the American public, and it stopped cold that particular scheme of the president’”

    Poništi
  7. We will hear plenty of Senators assert that “Trump’s conduct” or “it” doesn’t rise to the level of an impeachable offense;but no descrip of that conduct, which would make the statement absurd.(Try it: eg “trying to force a foreign leader to interfere in our elections etc is not”)

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    All New Harry Litman Episode -- Can I Get A Witness? -- with , and Jen Rodgers. Link for your listening and retweeting pleasure at

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    In this ALL NEW episode of --"Can I Get A Witness? -- and join me to analyze the decision not to call witnesses and conclude that McConnell may well have miscalculated. Here's the link: .

    Poništi
  10. Here's something to do while awaiting the Iowa results: an ALL NEW episode of with and bearing down on the Senate trial and the political consequences of the no-witness decision. Link here at .

    Poništi
  11. 3. velj

    Ugh. and here's former Clinton aide “Clinton saw the acquittal as a humbling end to that chap and I think Trump sees it as a way to start his re-elect.[Clinton] just wanted to shut the door & move on.Trump sees it as a jump star —‘this is what I’m going to run on.’"

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    An epitaph for the Republican Party in the time of Trump. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” — George Orwell

    Poništi
  13. 3. velj

    Apologies from . Our upcoming podcast with and --which by the way is pretty killer -- won't be published until Tuesday. 36 hours w/o sleep was a little too much to ask of our top-drawer, overworked editor .

    Poništi
  14. 3. velj

    Perhaps a moot point, but perhaps not, if the House subpoenas Bolton: explains why Trump may well have waived any executive privilege argument. At along with other exclusive material for supporters as thanks for helping us defray our costs.

    Poništi
  15. 2. velj

    Disappointed to learn that the debate I was set to have Tuesday with is now off because,per the station, Prof "Dershowitz wants now to come on on his own." , pls take this as an invitation to debate me any time on . You can set rules. Pls RT.

    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    Really? #1: “He believes Trump did everything he is accused of but that the crime does not [merit removal]”I don’t see what there is to deliberate about,” Alexander said. Really? 2: “right now, my view,this is the saddest day that I’ve seen in the Senate,”Murkowski said Friday

    Poništi
  17. 2. velj

    From Trump's merits brief in the tax subpoena cases, to be heard in the SCt 3/31: "Whether a subpoena is legislative must turn on its primary purpose—not on magic words. The primary purpose of these four subpoenas is law enforcement."

    Poništi
  18. 2. velj

    What took you so long? among the most consistently interesting, often unpredictable, thinkers not just on Twitter but in the country.

    Poništi
  19. 1. velj

    Such a pleasure doing — even on a Saturday! He just always seems to know how to bring the conversation up a notch or three. Thanks for having me.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    ALL NEW episode coming Monday with and . Veered more toward the political than we usually do, because we had great guests for it,and because the Sen themselves acted with such raw and sole political motive it's a part of the assessment.

    Poništi
  21. 1. velj

    We begin to pivot towards a political and constitutional assessment and is there. New episode coming Monday with TF stalwarts and and first-time guest--and he unsurprisingly had a wealth of great insights -- .

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·