Harlan I will be very disappointed if you don't follow up this viralish tweet with a link to your podcast. Also next ep needs to include a segment on what even is a bitcoin
-
-
-
Aaaaahhh we haven’t even posted it publicly
also: questions@bearwithus.zone -
This is your chaaaaance
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We don't know about the 396 kg , but the "around" .92 kg seems spot on.
This also means a single $Burstcoin transaction will cause around(!) 0.79384 g of CO₂.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Correction, I re-crunched the numbers myself, 17.6kg CO2 per gallon of E-10 (unrelated to my name) means it's 22.6 gallons of gas equivalent per BTC transaction. That's still the entire capacity of my truck's gas tank. CRIMINALIZE CRYPTO.
@NoahTheBastola@lil_bagel - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Inferences like these are invalid, without knowing the distribution over energy sources. I also think statements like these are unhelpful because they divert responsibility. More positive: encourage ppl to vote for carbon tax, convince people to eat less meat,buy less cars etc
-
Fight negative reputation of nuclear. These steps have advantage of solving multiple problems at once while taking large substantial steps against the impacts of climate change. (note: btc has economic incentive towards renewable: attaching to a source eventually pays for itself)
-
Okay, but also STOP USING BITCOIN. It is *designed* to run on an unsustainable digital gold standard.
-
I think there's utility to it, not to replace "fiat" or digital gold or whatever. Its transparency & mechanisms are useful in scenarios where there's a lack of trust. Example: to combat climate change, developing nations need to skip dirty energy sources. But this is unfair
-
Because developed nations are the current source of the problem & also got the world into this by exploiting cheap dirty sources. One way is to incentivize cooperation towards cleaner sources. Currently this is simply a way to line the pockets of corrupt NGOs & govn officials.
-
Equipped with easier tools to trace inputs/outputs, such corruption would be harder to hide. Without central control & a high computational cost, it's harder to fake. I can imagine a future with digital contracts connected to trusted oracles before payments are released.
-
In essence, could serve as trust amplifiers by being part of correlating device to acheive correlated equilibriums. Certainly doesn't look like it will scale as a currency (even though I will note, is currently the least racist way to receive intl payment eg no 3rd world patreon)
-
To clarify, tracking timestamps/input-output flows increases auditability. Can't rely on other party to do what it says. A tradeable token not controlled by them & not easily forgable has utility. Additionally, accountability is amplified by tools regular people can use to track
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Idiots. I’ve been doing this long before Bitcoin even existed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uhhhh what? Can’t people do LITERALLY ANYTHING ELSE to make money?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.