Sanjay Srivastava

@hardsci

Personality, reputation, lifespan development, research methods, open science. Blog: . Podcast: . He/him

Eugene, OR
Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @hardsci

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @hardsci

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    29. sij

    New preprint from and me. Accepted-in-principle as a stage 1 registered report, so no results yet. But let me tell you why I'm excited about this paper (and why you might be too)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 3 sata

    Tonight the Democratic Party will find out something very important: whose supporters think that caucuses are better than primaries and Iowa going first is, like, totally fair

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    We’re looking for Associate Editors for , SIPS’s official journal. All areas of psych. No previous editing experience required. Please consider applying & encourage others! To apply, submit CV and 500-word statement here:

    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    A cognitive anthropology dissertation on why "Trapper Keeper" is the basic level of categorization and not "Trapper"

    Poništi
  5. 1. velj

    Got an official communication about coronavirus from my university's provost. Props for taking a clear stand against xenophobia

    Poništi
  6. 29. sij

    Either way, I think it'll be interesting and relevant. So stay tuned. And for now - a big thanks to the AIID research team for making this dataset available to ask these important questions in

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 29. sij

    On the substance: One possibility is that we will find support for measurement invariance. That would give us greater confidence in past research on these associations Another possibility is that we will find bias, which might challenge the consensus on personality and SES

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 29. sij

    ... anyone who says registered reports slow you down should try one. That's true of some parts of the process, but it is very much the opposite of true for others

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 29. sij

    We just got the dataset yesterday, and since this was a registered report, we already had a first batch of results by the end of the day. It'll take a little while before I have anything to share with the world, since we have a lot to work through and think about. But damn...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 29. sij

    Finally we will look at whether "normative" age trends - which have sometimes been interpreted to reflect changes in social and economic circumstances - are actually the same or different at different levels of SES

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 29. sij

    Then we will calculate correlations between the Big Five and SES using the a priori personality scales. And if the analyses show evidence of measurement bias, we'll also run them with corrected scales if we can, to assess the practical impact of the bias

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 29. sij

    We will evaluate one of the most commonly used Big Five measures, the Big Five Inventory, for measurement invariance across education, income, and occupational prestige

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 29. sij

    So in this study we are going to do that. We will take advantage of a large dataset, the AIID study, which was made available to researchers through a call for registered reports !

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 29. sij

    This would be violated if, for example, the self-report items we use to measure personality mean different things to people who differ in education, income, or social position. Surprisingly few studies have tested that

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 29. sij

    But these studies rest on an important assumption: that when you measure the personalities of people with different socioeconomic backgrounds, you can make valid, apples-to-apples comparisons

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    Connections between SES and Big Five personality traits (and facets like grit or self-control) have gotten a lot of attention. Personality could be part of what sorts people into different social strata. And/or, social and economic contexts might shape personality

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 29. sij

    I find it interesting how often we equate "expertise" with "ability to get an effect" (or get a larger effect) - especially, though not only, in the context of replications. What about expertise in designing good controls, blinding, minimizing confounds and biases, etc?

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    New episode! "The Expertise of Death." We discuss Many Labs 4, designed to study the role of original-author expertise in replications. But surprise! The focal effect - mortality salience, from terror management theory - could not be replicated by anyone

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    I teach intro to linguistics in a school of education, and even though we cover phonology, morphology, syntax, etc... my main goal is for them to come out of the class knowing why a tweet like this is problematic.

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  20. 28. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·