The order in which I skim most ML papers is by first reading the abstract, then the figures and the captions (if they’re short and concise), and then either the first paragraph of the conclusion or the last paragraph of the intro to get a better sense of the work’s contributions.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Step 0. check to see who agrees with the paper on twitter
-
Or better yet, see who disagrees
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I don't understand. Is this satire? At what step do you actually read the paper? (Sorry, this might be mentioned in the paper, but I applied these three steps to it, and so I might have missed it
). -
You might be onto something. Perhaps that’s why I almost never read an entire paper—the last “paper” that I’ve read word to word, page to page, was
@Smerity’s!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
A good resource for this type of thing:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=733m6qBH-jI …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Interesting that none of steps 1, 2, and 3 involve actually reading the paper.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Step 1 and 2 only skim the surface. Step 3 is way too deep. The BFS approach sounds reasonable though
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
香港人
⠀