Lying-Weiler “represents objectivity in science”





-
-
-
The fact he can cite the debunked and retracted work of Exley should give everyone pause.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is rightly called an "attempt". Anyone who cites the discredited work of Exley, cannot be taken seriously. An IM 0.85mg dose in a vax only increases plasma concentration to 0.04 ng (0.8%) or normal Al blood concentration. Al is excreted rapidlyhttp://www.researchgate.net/post/At_what_rate_is_the_aluminium_adjuvant_absorbed_from_vaccine_into_the_bloodstream …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bwahahahaha! He actually put that on LinkedIn?


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would take dozens of tweets to point out everything he said that was wrong, dozens more to explain why. My favorite, though, is when he talks about elemental Al being rare in the environment, so you can't compare it to being injected...with non-elemental Al...
-
He is not a scientist's shoe lace.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.