Shouldn't the x-axis show per-capita GDP in 2005? Or else the y-axis should show growth now.
China's reported 6.6% growth rate still continues to defy what is usual for economies with similar income-levels....pic.twitter.com/FcWDNZS89A
-
-
-
results would look similar I think
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Almost like they aren’t being honest with numbers. Of course that couldn’t be it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just for fun, put the same countries into a corruption index
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What on Earth kind of best-fit line is that? A simple linear relationship would fit that data as well. No need to let you children annotate the graphs...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really. Much of China is still pretty much a peasant economy of small agriculture. Cities are richer but countryside poor. Most of the population still lives in the country. As it moves up from its base, growth is slowing. Also, much of the growth is down to government spend
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can’t wait to meet the boyfriend, George. George Glass.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Crazy debt burning rate says it could be truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For goodness sake, look at
#Baseeffect. If you want to do a real comparison, compare countries GDP growth rate when they had similar per capita GDP.@s1moncoxThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.