Strong disagree, there’s deeply normative and values-based disagreements at play in Democratic factionalism.
-
-
-
I don't deny strong normative differences between, say, Jacobin and the New Republic, but they're still broadly aligned on surface level values like social and economic equality. The differences are also rarely hashed out in ways that make things explicit, vs merely booing.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
How much of that perception is due to 1.) You being more exposed to inter-right disputes 2.) Inter-left disputes being more salient during the primary?
-
Hard to say although I recollect feeling similarly in 2014. Trump has definitely made things more interesting.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I have the opposite takeaway: the conflict on the left really is ideological but Dems -- especially centrists -- are still sorting out how to fight on those terms. The conflict on the right is increasingly identity & coalitional but still has an ideological veneer.
-
Yes, the conflict on the left is ideological, but the debates are uninteresting because they're dominated by concerns of coalition politics rather than merits. (For what it's worth I don't think the right's debates are all that interesting either.)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The debate over "David frenchism" is like make work for an obviously intellectually worn out ideology. There's plenty of interesting stuff on the left, you just need to know where to look
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@danielschuman curious if you agree -
Tweet je nedostupan.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
See, I was just thinking how the CPAC drama shows exactly the opposite
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.