Joi Ito’s resignation gives me mixed feelings. @MIT leadership clearly failed in this case, no question.
Show this thread
-
-
-
But choosing donors isn’t always so simple. Rejecting a convicted felon is easy. But what about a donor who is very unpopular, or who faces unverified accusations? At a time of division, mob judgement, and rampant misinformation, should a nonprofit be judge & jury of its donors?
Show this thread -
At
@codeorg we published a donation policy a year ago for this very reason. We knew a donor would eventually bring us controversy.https://code.org/about/donation-policy …Show this thread -
Just because I rejected Epstein (and others too) doesn’t mean my every decision will be popular. We take funds from corporations and billionaires - inevitably one of my choices will be questioned.
Show this thread -
When that day comes, I hope my supporters realize that rejecting a donor’s gift is like taking $ away from education to give it to that donor. Taking $ away from children’s education is not at all easy.
Show this thread -
While I can’t promise my decisions will always be popular, they will never be secret like at
@MIT. Transparency is a core value at@codeorg, and our donors are public (unless *they* request anonymity).http://code.org/about/donorsShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree with you 100%. The actions taken to hide taking funding speak volumes. They knew what they were doing was wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Question. Reading your policy it appears the idea is - we can reject the donation if we don’t like the donor. That’s useful and helpful - but it still means it’s case by case whether you will accept a donation or not right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.