You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I was introduced to Epstein as a possible donor to @codeorg. I had no clue who he was. From a short video call I got a bad feeling, then I googled him and ended talks. Fundraising is hard, and saying “no” is even harder. I’m glad I made this call. https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/13/20692415/jeffrey-epstein-scientists-sexual-harassment …
Note: this wasn’t a matter of instincts. I wouldn’t reject a donor on instinct. I googled him and he already had a conviction. Rejecting a donor is financially equivalent to taking $ away from education and giving it to the donor. It is not easy or straightforward to weigh.
It would be a harder choice if a potential donor had been accused but not convicted. It’s not my role (nor @codeorg’s) to play judge or jury. Meanwhile in today’s climate, mob opinions can form rapidly and divisively.
My job is to raise as much money as possible to support CS in schools, and rejecting a donor is financially equivalent to taking $ from education and giving it to the donor. I’m sure I will make other decisions that are unpopular, & I hope people recognize the difficult tradeoffs
I’m honestly okay with taking money from bad people and using it for a good cause. It’s a fine line to walk for non-profits.
Salam lotfan ba man tamas bgirid masalale mohemi bayad begam .modatha tolani donbale shoma migardam .lotfan pasokhgo bashid
Thank you, Hadi. You always do a good job and you protected http://Code.org by being thorough.
Thank you for making this decision.
Thank you for doing your Homework! Thank you for taking care of our mission!
Thank you. You made the right choice. 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
