𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫

They assume the least efficient and interesting possible approach, whose limits I noted and pointed out how to fix years ago in my analysis, and still find that it works substantially. 2.5 IQ points is a lot, economically!

They cite my analysis, so they know perfectly well that selection on multiple traits is superior in every way by a large factor and that increases in egg production will make even single-trait selection extremely powerful, so there's no excuse for this strawman approach.

btw you can manually add your stuff to Google scholar so that stuff like that wouldn't happen https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2016&author=Branwen+G.&title=Embryo+selection+for+intelligence … e.g. I have http://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=90VnVO4AAAAJ&hl=en …

The authors are aware of my analysis, as they cited in both the preprint and final. They just chose to ignore pretty much all of it.

I think I would need DOIs to make them GS-visible. I've looked into getting DOIs for http://gwern.net  pages but it's a very puzzling process, leaving me unsure how I would get any at all, and seems to be expensive to boot.

Authorea offers free DOIs I think. Also you don't need them (see my linked google scholar page)