"Companies that will freely spend millions of dollars to build or rent an AI data center and millions more hiring top technical talent will balk at the idea of spending tens or hundreds of thousands to acquire high quality data to train those models."https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2019/02/05/why-is-our-ai-revolution-built-on-free-data-rather-than-good-data/#6edd1c806be0 …
-
-
Replying to @robinhanson
I don't think this is true, and he gives no evidence for it. Companies like Amazon or Google or Tesla employ thousands or tens of thousands of contractors solely to label & annotate datasets like JFT-300million and that's after using active learning for label cleaning.
5 replies 1 retweet 37 likes -
Replying to @gwern @robinhanson
eg China https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/25/business/china-artificial-intelligence-labeling.html … or Africa https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46055595 …? Scale, which I've never heard of, is 10k people all on its own:https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/07/scale-whose-army-of-humans-annotate-raw-data-to-train-self-driving-and-other-ai-systems-nabs-18m/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Here's an example of the quite elaborate & expensive large-scale active learning (https://www.reddit.com/r/reinforcementlearning/search?q=flair%3AActive&sort=new&restrict_sr=on …) used to improve data quality by Google: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00982
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.