The Winklevii don't do it for you?
No. You found 3 examples, and then you drew categories around them. I rather doubt you had 3 lists of 'Billboad top acts, MLB players, NFL coaches' - definitely natural kinds! - handily classified by zygosity and luckily just sitting around to be immediately checked.
-
-
Another parameter that's missing and important: how many identical twins attempt the same things? It can be filled in but I'm not seeing it. I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying you're failing to be persuasive.
-
Pardon me for not having spent years researching this already.
If you don't see the pattern, it's fine to just say so; don't resort to dragging up examples from over half a century ago and claim this is evidence elite identical-twin pairs are perfectly normally common. -
You asked me to name 3 examples and are mad that I did. A counterexample here: the Winklevii, even together, aren't top-1000 rich, not even billionaires. This is not true of the Bee Gees. I don't need you to persuade me, that's optional, it's just, you haven't.
-
Point of fact: the Winklevii were billionaires, and I suspect will be again.
-
Point taken and prediction agreed with
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.