So based on nothing you decide it's all bunk because your own experiment was bunk. I'm all for reporting negative results and I like the way you did your experiment but now you're just pulling conclusions out of your ass. You're no better than them.
Lack of evidence for something extremely improbable is excellent reason to justify dismissing it. Ordinary claims require only ordinary evidence, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. LSD microdosing, if proponents are right, would be unprecedented.
-
-
I have seen a lot of anecdotes from people claiming some kind of effect. I too have experienced some kind of effect. That is indisputable. The only defensible position you can take is to question what the effects are. Instead you dismiss it as "there are no effects". Wtf?
-
/rolls eyes Fine. 'There are no effects besides those driven by publication bias, selective recall of data (see recent LSD microdosing paper!), expectancy effects, overly large doses in the perceptual range, & other effects of no particular interest & not the claimed mechanism.'
-
Replace "There are no" with "There is no evidence for" and we have a deal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.