It sounds semantic, but when you all your action "CD" it's usually technically incorrect (unless you're protesting the trespass laws themselves) and opens a window for a prosecutor to say you were intentionally breaking the law (rather than under the belief that it was 1A legal)
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
That shouldn't matter (1A should protect you whatever your intention) but not all judges are actually good at the law, *and* it can strengthen criminal conspiracy charges if they decide to press them.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Also this has nothing to do with legal but it's a huge pet peeve of mine so I'll stick it here: "Direct action" is a philosophy/strategy of base-led, issue campaign-driven movement organizing. It's inaccurate to use it as shorthand for "arrestable action."
Prikaži ovu nit -
Good luck out there and remember: Direct action gets the goods!
Prikaži ovu nit -
(Oh ps, I'm not a lawyer, this should not be construed as official legal advice, blah blah blah don't sue me)
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.