@gvanrossum In that case, please call it 3.10. People will assume 3 to 4 is painful, so don't call it 4 unless there is pain to switch.
Why Python 4 won't be like Python 3:http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html …
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@gvanrossum If it's not breaking backcompat, please don't increment the major numberThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Py4?! Already?! 3 isn't even that dev-accepted yet “
@gvanrossum: Why Python 4 won't be like Python 3: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html …” - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@gvanrossum@philshapiro all I can think of ishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R706isyDrqI …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@gvanrossum @jasonrdecastro yo real shit, someone follow jason so he follows me, k thanks.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@gvanrossum it will be like python 2 again? Thanks gods :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting:
@gvanrossum says v4 will just be the version after v3.9, no breakage. http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html … I like Guido's perspective.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@gvanrossum oh how interestingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@gvanrossum that bullet-point is still the main reason I can't make my python3 code work for python2 laggards out of the boxThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.