Public Sector Energy guy

@guy_public

All posts are personal opinion.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2018.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @guy_public

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @guy_public

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    F'ing brilliant! "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition... There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    But that leaves the immense power AM’s wield to solve for. That’s why the Big 3 need to change their approach to engagement & become “forceful stewards” acting on resolutions, board of director challenges, & if companies fail divestment

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 3. velj
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    First - it’s tapping into a deep vein of desire on the left to avoid conflict and work together. That unleashes pre emptive bargaining away of gains we don’t realize we’ve made. And the R support is shallow to say the least. Seen this movie, fool me once...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Most people are good when they are among the good. Observe them in the company of scoundrels and you will find out if they are moral or merely conformist.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Urbanist Twitter was way more intense in the 1940s

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Close but no dice. The NIMBYs have been out in force pretending they just protected the poor.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Tenant organizers are SO POWERFUL that they can singlehandedly kill (per Damien's Muhammad Ali meme) and simultaneously UTTERLY POWERLESS to get alternative legislation introduced. Seems like it's gotta be one or the other, no?

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    What's the bill number for the social housing bill that builds millions of units? I am looking for it but nothing's coming up.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    hey PHIMBYs now's your chance to actually propose a piece of legislation you think you can get through the CA statehouse! Or you can keep standing on the sidelines only emerging to FUD upzonings with vague promises of Red Vienna, whatever you prefer.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    After the anti-SB50 DSA people get their fill of YIMBY tears they've worked so hard for, guess how much more affordable housing will happen? Zero Cupertino, Beverly Hills, and Pasadena, on the other hand, will be celebrating into the night. You are your alliances...

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    we've already done this argument for 2 years now, you're wrong, next

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    money is just tokenised energy you can make money but you can't make energy

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    One of my big issues here is people who have never successfully passed a tax increase through a legislature! never even got close! never even tried! claiming certainty that we can pass a huge state tax increase dedicated exclusively to public housing in the near future. Y'all.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    “Local control” is one of those ideas like “states’ rights”: may sound reasonable in the abstract, but you have to look at its history and its actual operation. We currently have “local control” over zoning around transit. Look where it’s got us.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Chicago: We are the most corrupt and dysfunctional place in America. The Entire State of California: Hold my homeless, high taxes, high housing costs, extreme sprawl, over crowded schools, gridlock traffic, lung puncturing smog, and incompetent government.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    "Local control" is a smoke screen for the real issue: cities don't want to entitle more housing. They could rezone for MF housing tomorrow without any intervention by Sacramento. But they don't.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Senators cowering on the sidelines and refusing to vote either way would do well to remember that “The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of moral crisis preserve their neutrality.” 👀

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Senator , you just jettisoned your career as a climate activist at the alter of your constituent's NIMBYism. Your lies about SB 50 - on the floor of the Senate - were disgusting. I'm ashamed of you. The old you is ashamed of you, too.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Every senator voting or abstaining against while claiming to support renters is a coward. As an organizer, I would like to be the first to thank you all for radicalizing a new batch of YIMBYs to vote your asses out of office.

    Poništi
  21. 30. sij

    Your aren’t wrong. Sb 50 should be the new litmus test for ca dems

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·