You can’t just divide the total cost by the distance of track when the total cost includes brand new stations, station improvements, rolling stock and connectivity packages like two new tram lines in the West Midlands. It’s not only sloppy journalism it’s wilfully misleading.
-
-
-
Quite. This isn't even schoolboy mathematics. For a suposedly adult and intellectual newspaper this is just embarrassing. This is the stuff of the Sun & Express.
#hs2
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I hope you will do a similar analysis on The Lower Thames Crossing which costs even more per mile. It seems to avoid criticism because it is a road.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You can’t just divide the total cost by the distance of track when the total cost includes brand new stations, station improvements, rolling stock and connectivity packages like two new tram lines in the West Midlands. It’s not only sloppy journalism it’s wilfully misleading.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
No, and I bet it's more, anyway.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Excluding stations and rolling stock it's about £170m per mile. Much less than crossrail.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
No. Bypasses huge swathes of the country who won’t benefit from it
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.