It’s stupid on so many levels it’s head-spinning.
Show this thread
I’ve skimmed former guy’s complaint against Facebook and it’s every bit as stupid as you’d think it is.
-
-
-
It’s insane enough that he’s claiming Facebook’s a state actor. Yes, in extreme cases, if otherwise non-state actors are acting in cahoots with the government, they can become state actors. But that’s an absurdly hard thing to show, and nothing like that occurred here.
Show this thread -
But what makes this meta-insane is that he’s claiming that the Facebook was a FEDERAL state actor because it was entangled with the FEDERAL government at a time when HE WAS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Show this thread -
The defendants need to file a Rule 11 motion with their motion to dismiss.
Show this thread -
-
Not only that, and this is just another hypocrisy point, not a real legal point since the case is frivolous no matter what, his state-action argument is based upon Democratic legislators threatening to repeal 230–which was something *former guy* also did on multiple occasions.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Exclusive footage of his lawyers working on it:pic.twitter.com/Ohz7RIDKhA
-
Is that one of those perk company cars I've been hearing about?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's a fund raising ploy and nothing else.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.