And it's not a* true *free market since it has to be enforced (traditionally by a market court.) - not something a person had much choice about.
And in a rules-enforced market you do pay taxes in the form of overhead to maintain force and fraud provisions. There's no way around it! We see this use of law all the time - people are coerced into taking actions due to the threat of fraudulent use of enforcement.
-
-
all of these are minor inconveniences and inefficiencies that do not prevent a market from acting analogous to a free market performance wise while avoiding the potential catastrophic effects of a totally free market.
-
Sure, I agree. The point is to emulate a free market as best as possible where trust doesn't exist (and thus a free market isn't possible.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
