your fitting punishment is subsection e. of Article II of the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf …
I think maybe you're confused, being miseducated on language (as we all are today) - the word you are looking for is "compassion" and "being compassionate", which I will admit, I reserve compassion for real beings.
-
-
I take it that you don't like some if not all immigrants? Is it their coming from other countries that bothers you, specific countries, or just their skin color? Why do you think they replace you? Are they not "real beings"?
-
A news story is not a real being, as in many cases it has been revealed that photos are staged, numbers are falsified, or individual stories are simply not true. If you understood this, your time on the internet would be less emotionally charged.
-
This is possibly the dumbest argument anyone has ever made. Without hyperbole. This is...astoundingly stupid.
-
Translation: The world is overwhelming and confusing so... emotional triage time. If someone isn't a part of his personal Dunbar's number then fuck 'em. Tribalism masked by ignorance.
-
On the other hand, consider the following: without confirmation, it's possible to tell a person a number of things on the internet, which they may believe. If they take such hearsay (which can be completely fabricated) seriously, they will be upset over things .. that aren't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I appreciate your concern. I am not confused and I think, speak, and write very deliberately. The word I meant and used was 'empathy.' Since you have no compassion for Mexican children, I'll presume you mean they are not real beings. Thank you for making that explicit.
-
I don't see any real Mexican children here. In fact, there is just me here, just as with you, it's just you. On the internet, we have no bodies, as some philosopher stated. Pretending to compassion to attempt to seize the moral high ground is a rather silly thing to do!
-
I'm not interested in debating the ontology of unseen objects. If you are a solipsist, that's your problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
