You can't blow up a nuclear reactor. Its physically impossible.https://twitter.com/yestiseye/status/1047255272379404288 …
-
-
Potentially, if done badly, yes, dangerous. It's a spiderman thing.
Then there's climate change to deal with of course, and we have to be rigorous about the data. Hard to see a pathway without it.https://www.electricitymap.org/?page=map&solar=false&remote=true&wind=false … -
I don't believe in climate change in any way, but if you're adding carbon to the atmosphere without removing it, there will eventually be a problem.
-
And that's fine by me(which might be a surprise… people tend to let their emotions take over in this area). I *know* it's a problem, but will freely admit I'm not sure if the timescale is a few decades or 8/9 decades which to fix it. Happy to pitch the cleaner air argument.

-
carbon isn't a pollutant, so no, I don't see a "cleaner air" argument here. And overall it seems to be something that would be an issue on the timescale of centuries, and reducing emissions isn't a solution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
